How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Binary zero-one loss risks are the testing error probabilities
Statement
Let be disjoint subsets of a parameter set in a statistical experiment. Let be a randomized test on the binary action space , with meaning reject, and write . Define the zero-one error loss by so is zero when . For and the risk of Loss functions and risk,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A statistical experiment, disjoint hypotheses , and a binary randomized test with test function .
Randomized tests: the action space is with its full sigma-algebra, each is a probability measure, and .
Loss functions and risk: if each action section of is measurable and nonnegative, then .
Nonnegative simple measurable functions, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, and The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions: the integral of an indicator of a measurable singleton under is the -measure of that singleton.
Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: expectation under is integration with respect to .
Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: a real measurable function is integrable when the integral of its absolute value is finite.
The Lebesgue integral is linear on : the integral is linear on integrable functions.
Statistical experiments and Probability measures and probability spaces: each is a probability measure with .
Proof
For fixed , the action section is one of , , or . Each is nonnegative and measurable on the full sigma-algebra of , so [F2] defines its risk.
On , the section is , whose integral under is by [F1] and [F3]. On , the section is , whose integral is because is a probability measure.
Substituting these inner integrals into [F2] and using [F4] gives on and on .
Since and , [F5] and [F8] show that each has integral at most . Thus their absolute-value integrals are finite, so they are integrable by [F6]. Linearity [F7] and [F8] give . The two risk identities now have the asserted form.
Depends on
- Statistical experiments
- Randomized tests
- Loss functions and risk
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- Nonnegative simple measurable functions
- The integral of a nonnegative simple function
- The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable
Used by
- Test size and power Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ryan Martin, Lecture Notes on Advanced Statistical Theory, §5.1, PDF pp. 100–102 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Hoff, Statistical Decision Problems, §§4.1–4.2, PDF pp. 7–8 (standard reference, not scraped)