Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Bockstein is independent of lift and representative

Statement

Assume AC and the hypotheses and notation of Bockstein connecting operation. The class β[c] is independent of the chosen B-cochain lift of c and of the cocycle representing [c].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A short exact sequence 0→A→iB→qC→0 and a cocycle c∈Cn(X;C).

[F1]

The Bockstein construction chooses b with q∗b=c, uniquely solves i∗a=δb, and proposes β[c]=[a] (Bockstein connecting operation).

[F2]

AC supplies a simultaneous choice from any set-indexed family of nonempty fibres (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct cochain comparison
1.1givenF1

The cochain a in [F1] is a cocycle. Indeed, i∗(δa)=δ(i∗a)=δ2b=0; injectivity of i∗ gives δa=0.

2.1F1step 1.1

Changing only the lift changes a by a coboundary. If b′ is another lift of c, then q∗(b′−b)=0. Exactness gives a unique h∈Cn(X;A) with b′−b=i∗h. If a′ is defined from b′, then i∗(a′−a)=δ(b′−b)=i∗(δh), hence a′−a=δh.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

Changing the cocycle representative also changes a by a coboundary. Write c′=c+δu. Use the lifting choice of [F2] to take v∈Cn−1(X;B) with q∗v=u. For an arbitrary lift b′ of c′,

q∗(b′−b−δv)=c′−c−δu=0.

Thus b′=b+δv+i∗h for some h∈Cn(X;A). Applying δ and using δ2v=0 gives a′=a+δh.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 show that [a′]=[a] for either permitted change, so β[c] is well defined.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources