Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bockstein detects integral two-torsion in real projective space

Example

Assume AC. Let n≥2 be an integer and let a∈H1(RPn;F2) be the unique nonzero class. For the integral and mod-two coefficient sequences, respectively, write

βZ:H1(RPn;F2)⟶H2(RPn;Z),β2:H1(RPn;F2)⟶H2(RPn;F2).

Then βZ(a) generates H2(RPn;Z)≅Z/2, and

β2(a)=Sq1(a)=a2.

In particular, a2 is the nonzero element of H2(RPn;F2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥2, the space X=RPn, and its unique nonzero class a∈H1(X;F2).

[F1]

For 0→Z→2Z→F2→0, Bockstein connecting operation represents the integral Bockstein by lifting a cocycle c to an integral cochain c^, writing δc^=2h, and taking [h].

[F2]

This Bockstein class is independent of the lift and representative by The Bockstein is independent of lift and representative.

[F3]

The choice-free integral clause of Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map gives, for n≥2,

H0(X;Z)=Z,H1(X;Z)=Z/2,H2(X;Z)=0.

[F4]

Under AC, Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology gives the integral cohomology sequence with its Ext term computed in the first variable.

H∗(RP∞;F2)≅F2[a∞],∣a∞∣=1,

and restriction to X=RPn is an isomorphism through degree n. For n≥2 it sends a∞ to a and a∞2 to a2, so a and a2 are the unique nonzero classes in degrees one and two.

[F6]

The mod-two Bockstein is Sq1 by Sq^1 is the mod-two Bockstein.

[F7]

The top-square identity in Steenrod normalization, instability, suspension, and top square says Sqr(x)=x⌣x for a class x of degree r.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the present combined argument. [F1], [F2], [F4], and [F5] are cited under their published AC hypotheses; the integral cellular calculation in [F3], the canonical residue lift, and the finite Ext calculations below introduce no further choice.

Verification

technique · direct lift-and-divide calculation
1.1givenF1F2

Choose a mod-two singular cocycle c representing a. Let c^ be its valuewise lift with values zero or one. Since c is a cocycle, every value of δc^ is even. Hence there is a unique integral cochain h with δc^=2h, and [F1]--[F2] give βZ(a)=[h].

1.2F5F6F7

For the mod-two coefficient sequence, the Bockstein is the square of a. Indeed, [F6] and the degree-one instance of [F7] give

β2(a)=Sq1(a)=a⌣a=a2.

Since n≥2, [F5]'s restriction isomorphism in degree two carries the nonzero polynomial class a∞2 to a2, so a2 is the unique nonzero degree-two mod-two class.

1.3F3F4

The two required integral cohomology groups follow from the A-level cellular calculation. In UCT degree one, the outside terms are

Ext⁡Z1(Z,Z)=0,Hom⁡Z(Z/2,Z)=0.

The first equality holds because Z is free, and the second because Z is torsion-free. Hence H1(X;Z)=0. In degree two, the Hom term is zero because H2(X;Z)=0, while the free resolution

0⟶Z→2Z⟶Z/2⟶0

computes Ext⁡Z1(Z/2,Z) as the cokernel of multiplication by two on Z, namely Z/2. Exactness therefore gives H2(X;Z)≅Z/2.

2.1F5step 1.1step 1.3

The integral class [h] is nonzero. Suppose instead that h=δk for an integral degree-one cochain k. Then

δ(c^−2k)=2h−2δk=0.

By H1(X;Z)=0 in step 1.3, there is an integral degree-zero cochain ℓ with c^−2k=δℓ. Reduction modulo two would give c=δ(ℓ mod 2), contrary to the nonzero class a=[c] in [F5].

3.1step 1.3step 2.1

The integral Bockstein class is a generator. Indeed, step 1.3 identifies H2(X;Z) with a group having exactly one nonzero element, step 2.1 makes βZ(a) that element and therefore a generator of its integral two-torsion.

4.1F3F4F5A1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1∎

The endpoint and excluded cases introduce no missing assertion. The endpoint n=2 is included: the two degree-two groups in step 1.3 and [F5] are still nonzero, whereas n=0,1 are excluded because the promised integral degree-two target is absent. The zero degree-one class is explicitly excluded because its Bockstein is zero and cannot generate. Real projective spaces are nonempty, and their point and degree-zero cases do not enter the claim. The calculation uses ordinary singular cochains, including degenerate simplices, and makes no cellular-to-singular cochain identification. AC occurs through [F1], [F2], [F4], and [F5]; the zero/one lift itself is canonical. No biconditional or converse is asserted.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources