Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The derived couple maps are well defined

Statement

The three maps i,j,k of the derived-couple construction exist in every abelian category and are independent of all local preimages and cycle representatives. Their degrees are (1,1), (r,r) and (1,0), respectively. No choice of global sections is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Derived exact couple gives the image and homology quotient objects and the proposed formulas.

[F2]

Exact couple gives kerj=imi, kerk=imj, keri=imk and the consecutive zero composites.

[F3]

Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus permits epic local lifting, descent of subobject membership and unique quotient maps.

Proof

Given: A page-r exact couple. All expressions below are at a fixed homogeneous component with the typed shifts in [F1]; local lifts mean epic pullbacks as in [F3].

1.1

If a is locally ix, then ia=i(ix) lies in imi. Descent of this membership shows that i restricted to DD factors through the target D. Its factorization is unique because that inclusion is monic. This defines i without any preimage choice.

F1F3
1.2

The composite j:DE lands in kerd since dj=jkj=0. Follow it by kerdE. This map kills keri: an arrow into keri=imk locally has form kz, and its image is [jkz]=[dz]=0. Hence it descends through D/keriimi to j, uniquely. Explicitly, if ix=iy locally, then xy=kz after a further epic pullback, so [jx][jy]=[dz]=0. Thus its formula is independent of the preimage.

F1F2F3
1.3

On kerd, the map k lands in kerj=imi, because jke=de=0. Changing a cycle representative by a boundary dz changes its image by kdz=kjkz=0. Thus this restricted map kills the boundary image and descends uniquely to k:ED. Equality after the epic cycle quotient also proves independence for arbitrary maps into E, not just element representatives.

F1F2F3
2.1

For i the degree remains (1,1). To compute j on Dp,q, its local i-preimage is at Dp1,q+1 and j sends it to Epr,q+r, giving degree (r,r). The cycle restriction and quotient for k preserve the original degree (1,0). The constructions above still apply when any image or homology object is zero, and for r=1 give degj=(1,1). Every lift was a finite local epic pullback used to prove a canonical factorization; no global representative selection or AC was used.

F1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Derived exact couple.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources