Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The derived couple is exact

Statement

The derived data of a page-r exact couple form a page-(r+1) exact couple. In particular imi=kerj, imj=kerk and imk=keri, at their respective shifted vertices.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Derived exact couple and The derived couple maps are well defined supply the canonical maps of degrees (1,1), (r,r) and (1,0), with rules i(a)=ia, j(ix)=[jx], k([e])=ke.

[F2]

Exact couple supplies the three original exactness conditions and consecutive zero composites.

[F3]

Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus licenses local epic lifts and descent of subobject containments.

Proof

Given: The original page-r exact couple. All local representatives and subsequent lifts are obtained by finitely many epic pullbacks; after each computation subobject membership descends by [F3].

1.1

At Dp,q, let a lie locally in kerj and write a=ix with x at Dp1,q+1. The condition [jx]=0 says locally jx=dz=jkz for z at Ep,q+1. Thus xkzkerj and locally xkz=iy for y at Dp2,q+2. It follows that a=ix=i2y, since ik=0. This belongs to imi because iy is in Dp1,q+1. Conversely a local element of imi has the form i2y and j(i2y)=[jiy]=0. These two local containments descend to kerjp,q=imip1,q+1.

F1F2F3
1.2

At Ep,q, represent a local class in kerk by a d-cycle e. Since Dp1,qDp1,q is monic, k[e]=0 implies ke=0 in D. Original exactness gives locally e=jx for x at Dp+r1,qr+1. Then [e]=j(ix), with ix at Dp+r,qr. Conversely kj(ix)=kjx=0. Thus kerkp,q=imjp+r,qr after descent.

F1F2F3
1.3

At Dp,q, let a lie in keri. Its image in Dp,q satisfies ia=0, so locally a=ke for e at Ep+1,q. Since a already lies in D=imi, we have ja=0; therefore de=jke=ja=0. The class [e] is defined and k[e]=a. Conversely ik[e]=ike=0 for every cycle class. Descending gives kerip,q=imkp+1,q.

F1F2F3
2.1

These are exactly the three equalities required for page r+1, with the degrees supplied by [F1]. The arguments include zero kernels, images and homology objects: the reverse containments are zero-composite identities and never require a nonzero witness. At r=1 the shifted indices give the first derived couple; every larger page is covered by the same printed formulas. No section, global lift or axiom of choice is used.

F1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Derived exact couple.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources