How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Deriving an exact couple once
Example
Derive once the initial exact couple of the two-step filtration on in The exact couple of a two step filtration. Its new page is unchanged, but its image terms shift: All other and off-diagonal terms vanish. The new has degree , sending the subgroup at isomorphically to and the group at by the parity quotient to .
Facts & Assumptions
The exact couple of a two step filtration specifies the initial groups, maps and zero .
Derived exact couple uses , , with , restricted and .
The derived couple is exact states the three exactness equalities and the page-two grading; here they can also be checked explicitly.
Verification
Given: The initial couple in [F1], whose nonzero groups have total degree zero.
Since , the differential is zero and by the identity cycle quotient. For take the image of . It is zero for , the subgroup for , and the whole for . These are the displayed terms.
The restricted at is the inclusion and at is identity; at smaller indices it has zero source. For its preimage under the old inclusion is the same element of , so . At the old is identity on , so is its parity class in . Every other has zero target, and by its defining formula. Thus the index changes by rather than remaining degree zero.
At before , when both the incoming image and the kernel are zero; when both are ; when both are the whole group; and when both are zero. Every onto a nonzero term is surjective, so its image equals . All maps are injective, so their kernels are zero, exactly the incoming images. Off-diagonal terms are zero. This verifies all exactness claims of [F3] directly, with the transition indices now one and two. The derivation used only literal subgroup inclusions and quotient maps; no chosen section or AC occurs.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)