Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Deriving an exact couple once

Example

Derive once the initial exact couple of the two-step filtration on Z/4 in The exact couple of a two step filtration. Its new E page is unchanged, but its D image terms shift: Dp,p2={0p0,2Z/4p=1,Z/4p2,E0,02=2Z/4,E1,12=(Z/4)/(2Z/4). All other E2 and off-diagonal D2 terms vanish. The new j has degree (1,1), sending the subgroup at (1,1) isomorphically to E0,02 and the group at (2,2) by the parity quotient to E1,12.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The exact couple of a two step filtration specifies the initial groups, maps and zero k.

[F2]

Derived exact couple uses D2=imi1, E2=H(E1,j1k1), with j2(i1x)=[j1x], restricted i2 and k2[e]=k1e.

[F3]

The derived couple is exact states the three exactness equalities and the page-two grading; here they can also be checked explicitly.

Verification

Given: The initial couple in [F1], whose nonzero groups have total degree zero.

1.1

Since k1=0, the differential j1k1 is zero and E2=E1 by the identity cycle quotient. For Dp,p2 take the image of Dp1,1p1Dp,p1. It is zero for p0, the subgroup {0,2} for p=1, and the whole Z/4 for p2. These are the displayed terms.

F1F2
2.1

The restricted i2 at p=1 is the inclusion {0,2}Z/4 and at p2 is identity; at smaller indices it has zero source. For aD1,12={0,2} its preimage under the old inclusion is the same element of D0,01, so j2(a)=aE0,02. At p=2 the old i1 is identity on Z/4, so j2(a) is its parity class in E1,12. Every other j2 has zero target, and k2=0 by its defining formula. Thus the j index changes by (1,1) rather than remaining degree zero.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

At D2 before j2, when p=1 both the incoming i2 image and the kernel are zero; when p=2 both are {0,2}; when p3 both are the whole group; and when p0 both are zero. Every j2 onto a nonzero E2 term is surjective, so its image equals kerk2. All i2 maps are injective, so their kernels are zero, exactly the incoming k2 images. Off-diagonal terms are zero. This verifies all exactness claims of [F3] directly, with the transition indices now one and two. The derivation used only literal subgroup inclusions and quotient maps; no chosen section or AC occurs.

F3step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources