How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The differential descends to a quotient complex
Statement
Let be a subcomplex in an abelian category. For every the differential induces a unique morphism and these induced morphisms satisfy .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A subcomplex with quotient maps .
In a subcomplex, the differential restricts to (Subcomplex).
A cokernel is universal among arrows vanishing on the given subobject (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers).
In a chain complex, consecutive differentials compose to zero (Chain complex in an abelian category).
Proof
By [L1], the composite kills , because lands in and kills . Hence [L2] gives a unique map with
Composing the identity from step 1.1 twice and using [L3], Since is epic as a cokernel map, .
Depends on
Used by
- Quotient complex Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)