PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-12

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

E zero is the associated graded complex

Statement

In the specified quotient model, $(E^{0}, d^{0})$ is the associated graded complex: $E_{p, q}^{0} = {gr}_{p} C_{p + q}$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A filtered chain complex with the specified initial-page quotient model.

[F1]

The initial page is $F_{p} C_{n} / F_{p - 1} C_{n}$ (R page of the spectral sequence of a filtered complex).

[F2]

At $r = 0$ , the page differential is characterized on quotient representatives by $[x] \mapsto [d_{n} x]$ (The filtered differential induces d r on the r page).

[F3]

The associated graded complex has the unique differential satisfying $d_{p, q}^{0} π_{p, n} = π_{p, n - 1} (d_{n} ∣_{F_{p} C_{n}})$ (The associated graded of a filtered complex is a bigraded complex), as supplied by quotient-complex descent (The differential descends to a quotient complex).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

The defining numerator and denominator of [F1] are $Z^{0} = F_{p} C_{n}$ and $B^{0} = F_{p - 1} C_{n}$ . Their quotient is exactly the chosen model of ${gr}_{p} C_{n}$ .

2.1

By [F2], the initial-page differential sends every quotient representative $[x]$ to $[d_{n} x]$ , so its composite with the quotient projection is $π_{n - 1} d_{n}$ . By [F3], the associated-graded quotient differential is the unique map with that same composite. The quotient projection is epic, hence the two maps agree. With $n = p + q$ , their common bidegree is $(0, - 1)$ .

F2F3step 1.1∎

Source notes

Weibel, Chapter 5, Construction 5.4.6 and Lemma 5.4.7, pp.133–134; Sharifi, Theorem 4.2.3, pp.91–92. Increasing homological indices are used here.

Depends on

Used by

E zero and e one page conventions are universal across sources False statement
E one is homology of the associated graded complex Proposition
The cohomological filtered complex construction Theorem

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
Romyar Sharifi, Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)