Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Over an infinite base field, no nonzero polynomial vanishes at the conjugate tuple of every element

Statement

Let K/F be a finite Galois extension of degree n whose base field F is infinite, and list Gal(K/F)={σ1,,σn}. Then for every nonzero fK[x1,,xn] (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration) there exists αK with

f(σ1α,,σnα)0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite Galois extension K/F of degree n with F infinite and Gal(K/F)={σ1,,σn}; by [L4] the F-vector space K has dimension n, so an ordered F-basis (α1,,αn) of K exists (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).

[L1]

Let S be an integral domain and RS an infinite subring. If gS[x1,,xm] satisfies g(a1,,am)=0 for all a1,,amR, then g=0 (A polynomial vanishing at every tuple from an infinite subdomain is the zero polynomial).

[L2]

For a finite Galois extension K/F of degree n with Gal(K/F)={σ1,,σn} and α1,,αnK, the list (α1,,αn) is an ordered F-basis of K if and only if the matrix A with Aij=σi(αj) is invertible (For a finite Galois extension, (αj) is a base-field basis exactly when the matrix (σiαj) is invertible).

[L3]

For commutative rings R,S, a unital ring homomorphism φ ⁣:RS and sS, there is a unique unital ring homomorphism R[x]S extending φ on constants and sending x to s (Universal property of R[x]: a coefficient homomorphism and the image of x determine a unique ring homomorphism). Iterating this along Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration gives, for any commutative K-algebra T and any t1,,tnT, a unique K-algebra homomorphism K[x1,,xn]T sending xi to ti.

[L5]

AMn(K) is invertible when some BMn(K) satisfies AB=In=BA; such a B is unique and written A1 (Invertible matrices and the general linear group GLn(F), Entrywise ring-matrix operations, rectangular matrix products, identity matrices and transpose).

Proof

technique · contrapositive
1.1

It suffices to prove the contrapositive: if fK[x1,,xn] satisfies f(σ1α,,σnα)=0 for every αK, then f=0. Assume that hypothesis on f.

contrapositive-reduceassume-hyp
1.2

Fix an ordered F-basis (α1,,αn) of K and put Aij=σi(αj); by [L2] the matrix A is invertible, with inverse A1 as in [L5].

L2L4L5given
2.1

For cFn write α(c):=jcjαj; then cα(c) is a bijection FnK because the αj form a basis, and σi(α(c))=jcjσi(αj)=(Ac)i since each σi fixes F pointwise and is additive.

step 1.2given
2.2

Let ψ ⁣:K[x1,,xn]K[x1,,xn] be the unique K-algebra homomorphism with ψ(xi)=jAijxj, and ψ the unique one with ψ(xi)=j(A1)ijxj; both exist by [L3].

step 1.2L3
3.1

For cFn, the evaluation homomorphism K[x1,,xn]K at c composed with ψ sends xi to jAijcj=(Ac)i, so by the uniqueness clause of [L3] it is evaluation at Ac; hence ψ(f) evaluated at c equals f(Ac)=f(σ1α(c),,σnα(c)), which is 0 by the hypothesis of step 1.1.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L3
4.1

So ψ(f) vanishes at every tuple from the infinite subring F of the integral domain K, and [L1] gives ψ(f)=0.

step 3.1L1given
5.1

The composite ψψ is a K-algebra endomorphism sending xi to jAijk(A1)jkxk=k(AA1)ikxk=xi, so it is the identity by the uniqueness clause of [L3]; applying ψ to step 4.1 therefore gives f=ψ(ψ(f))=ψ(0)=0, which is the contrapositive.

step 2.2step 4.1L3L5discharge-contrapositive

Remarks

  • Where infiniteness of F enters. Only in step 4.1, through [L1]. Over a finite base field the conclusion is false: with F=q and n=[K:F], the nonzero polynomial x1qnx1 vanishes at every conjugate tuple, since every element of K satisfies xqn=x. The finite case of the normal basis theorem is therefore proved by a different argument (Every finite cyclic extension has a normal basis).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources