Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The loop residue form is alternating

Statement

For all u,vLg, ω(u,v)=ω(v,u) and ω(u,u)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A loop algebra over C and its residue form.

[F1]

Residue two cocycle on a loop algebra defines ω(xf,yq)=B(x,y)Res(fqdt) with B symmetric.

Proof

1.1

For any Laurent polynomial a=jajtj, the coefficient of t1 in a=jjajtj1 is 0a0=0. Thus Res(adt)=0, including constant and zero a.

F1algebra
2.1

For pure tensors u=xf, v=yq, symmetry of B and the product rule give ω(u,v)+ω(v,u)=B(x,y)Res((fq)dt)=0.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Expand arbitrary u,v into their finite tensor sums and apply step 2.1 term by term. This proves skewness for all inputs, including empty sums. Setting v=u gives 2ω(u,u)=0; since the field is C, division by 2 gives alternatingness.

step 2.1givenalgebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources