How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The loop residue form is alternating
Statement
For all , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A loop algebra over and its residue form.
Residue two cocycle on a loop algebra defines with symmetric.
Proof
For any Laurent polynomial , the coefficient of in is . Thus , including constant and zero .
For pure tensors , , symmetry of and the product rule give .
Expand arbitrary into their finite tensor sums and apply step 2.1 term by term. This proves skewness for all inputs, including empty sums. Setting gives ; since the field is , division by gives alternatingness.
Depends on
Used by
- Untwisted affine central extension Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kleshchev, Lectures on Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, equations (7.1)-(7.2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Perrin, Introduction to Kac-Moody Groups and Lie Algebras, Lemma 12.2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)