How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The loop residue form satisfies the Lie two cocycle identity
Statement
For all ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The algebraic loop bracket and the residue form.
The form in Residue two cocycle on a loop algebra is defined using invariant symmetric and Laurent differentiation.
Proof
For , invariance and symmetry give , and the cyclic repetition gives as the same scalar .
For , , , the required cyclic sum is . Expanding the three derivatives gives twice each of , so the sum is .
If , its derivative has coefficient . Step 2.1 therefore vanishes. Each general input is a finite sum of pure tensors, and the cyclic expression is trilinear; distributing reduces it to these vanishing summands. Empty sums, zero arguments and repeated arguments are included.
Depends on
Used by
- Untwisted affine central extension Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kleshchev, Lectures on Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, Section 7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Perrin, Introduction to Kac-Moody Groups and Lie Algebras, Lemma 12.2.5 and Corollary 12.2.6 (standard reference, not scraped)