Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The reduced Burau module is free of rank n minus one

Statement

Let Mred=H1(X~;Z) be the reduced Burau module over Λ1=Z[t±1] of The reduced Burau homology module, with the Λ1-action induced by the deck generator t. Then Mred is a free Λ1-module of rank n−1. The freeness is realised on the lifted spine Σ of The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model: transporting the isomorphism H1(X~)≅H1(Σ) along the cellular computation there, Mred has the Λ1-basis given by the absolute cycle classes ϵi−ϵn, 1≤i≤n−1, where ϵi=ei(0) is the level-0 lifted spine edge in the notation of that lemma (the generators of the cellular chain module C1(Σ) declared at level 0). In particular the free rank equals n−1, and the deck generator acts by t⋅(ϵi−ϵn)=ϵi(1)−ϵn(1), the level-1 classes. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1, the Burau cover p:X~→X with deck generator t, the lifted spine Σ of The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model with its level-k edge classes ei(k), and the reduced Burau module Mred=H1(X~;Z) with its Λ1-action t↦(Tt)∗.

[F1]

The lifted spine has the cellular chain complex C1(Σ)=⨁i=1nΛ1ei, C0(Σ)=Λ1v, ∂1ei=(t−1)v, where ei=ei(0) and v=v0; consequently H1(Σ)=ker⁡∂1=⨁i=1n−1Λ1(ei−en) is a free Λ1-module of rank n−1, and the deck action on the cellular chains satisfies t⋅ei(k)=ei(k+1) (The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model).

[F2]

There is an isomorphism of Λ1-modules Φ:H1(Σ)→H1(X~)=Mred, induced by the deck-equivariant homotopy equivalence (X~,p−1d)→(Σ,Σ0), where the module structures are those induced by the deck actions (The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model, The reduced Burau homology module).

[F3]

Λ1 is an integral domain and t−1≠0 (Units, powers and the domain property of the Laurent polynomial ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3

The homology of the spine. By [F1] the cellular chain module is free on e1,…,en over Λ1 with ∂1ei=(t−1)v, and H1(Σ) is the kernel of ∂1; as computed in [F1] this kernel is exactly the direct sum of the rank-one free submodules Λ1(ei−en), 1≤i≤n−1, so H1(Σ) is free of rank n−1 with basis the classes of ei−en.

2.1F2step 1.1

Transport to Mred. The Λ1-module isomorphism Φ of [F2] carries the basis classes of ei−en in H1(Σ) to linearly independent Λ1-generators of Mred: the inverse image of any Λ1-linear relation among the images would be a relation among the ei−en in the free module H1(Σ). Hence Mred is free of rank n−1 with the transported basis, as asserted.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

The deck action on the basis. Since t⋅ei=ei(1) in the cellular chain module by [F1], the cycle t⋅(ei−en) is ei(1)−en(1); as these are the level-1 classes, the deck generator acts on the spine basis by t⋅(ϵi−ϵn)=ϵi(1)−ϵn(1), and by Λ1-linearity of Φ the same formula holds for the transported basis of Mred.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. The module Mred is free of rank n−1 with basis the classes ϵi−ϵn (1≤i≤n−1), and the deck generator acts by the level-one classes; no choice principle was used, the whole argument being the transport of the cellular computation of [F1] along the deck-equivariant isomorphism of [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources