How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The reduced Burau module is free of rank n minus one
Statement
Let be the reduced Burau module over of The reduced Burau homology module, with the -action induced by the deck generator . Then is a free -module of rank . The freeness is realised on the lifted spine of The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model: transporting the isomorphism along the cellular computation there, has the -basis given by the absolute cycle classes , , where is the level- lifted spine edge in the notation of that lemma (the generators of the cellular chain module declared at level ). In particular the free rank equals , and the deck generator acts by , the level- classes. No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the Burau cover with deck generator , the lifted spine of The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model with its level- edge classes , and the reduced Burau module with its -action .
The lifted spine has the cellular chain complex , , , where and ; consequently is a free -module of rank , and the deck action on the cellular chains satisfies (The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model).
There is an isomorphism of -modules , induced by the deck-equivariant homotopy equivalence , where the module structures are those induced by the deck actions (The cyclic cover retracts onto the lifted flower and has a deck-equivariant spine model, The reduced Burau homology module).
is an integral domain and (Units, powers and the domain property of the Laurent polynomial ring).
Proof
The homology of the spine. By [F1] the cellular chain module is free on over with , and is the kernel of ; as computed in [F1] this kernel is exactly the direct sum of the rank-one free submodules , , so is free of rank with basis the classes of .
Transport to . The -module isomorphism of [F2] carries the basis classes of in to linearly independent -generators of : the inverse image of any -linear relation among the images would be a relation among the in the free module . Hence is free of rank with the transported basis, as asserted.
The deck action on the basis. Since in the cellular chain module by [F1], the cycle is ; as these are the level- classes, the deck generator acts on the spine basis by , and by -linearity of the same formula holds for the transported basis of .
Conclusion. The module is free of rank with basis the classes (), and the deck generator acts by the level-one classes; no choice principle was used, the whole argument being the transport of the cellular computation of [F1] along the deck-equivariant isomorphism of [F2].
Depends on
Used by
- The reduced Burau representation Definition
- Unreduced and reduced Burau matrices for three strands Example
- The Burau determinant recovers the Alexander polynomial of a closed braid Proposition
- The reduced and unreduced Burau representations have the same kernel Proposition
- The topological and matrix Burau representations agree Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stephen J. Bigelow, The Burau representation is not faithful for n = 5, Geometry & Topology 3 (1999) 397-404, Definition 1.1, Theorems 1.2 and 1.4 (printed pp. 397-399) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vasudha Bharathram, Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, The Burau representation is faithful for n = 4, arXiv:2607.05283v1 (6 July 2026), section 2 (printed pp. 1-5) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, Braids: A Survey (background on Burau matrices, the cyclic cover and absolute homology) (standard reference, not scraped)