How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Deleting the low-degree vertices of a -self-regular set of density leaves more than of it, and that remainder is -dense
Statement
Let , let be nonempty, and suppose is a -regular pair of density . Then there is a subset with such that is -dense.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph , a real , a nonempty set , and a density such that is -regular.
In a -regular pair , all but fewer than vertices of have at least neighbours in any subset of size at least (In a regular pair, fewer than vertices have too small a degree into a large subset, and fewer than have too large a degree, -regular pairs and self-regular vertex sets).
A set is -dense exactly when every vertex has at most non-neighbours inside it other than itself (-sparse, -dense and -restricted vertex sets).
Proof
Apply [L1] to the pair with . Fewer than vertices of then have fewer than neighbours in .
Let be the remaining vertices. Then .
For , at most of its neighbours lie outside , so has at least neighbours in .
Hence has at most non-neighbours inside . By [L2], the set is -dense.
Depends on
- $\epsilon$-regular pairs and self-regular vertex sets
- In a regular pair, fewer than $\epsilon|X|$ vertices have too small a degree into a large subset, and fewer than $\epsilon|X|$ have too large a degree
- Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets
- $c$-sparse, $c$-dense and $c$-restricted vertex sets
- A set is $c$-sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most $c$ times its size
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics, Lemma 2.2.3 and Remark 2.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)