How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The truncated Perron kernel
Statement
Let and let be the three-valued kernel of The symmetric Perron kernel. For ,
Proof
Given: and the symmetric kernel value .
For , move the finite segment rightward and then let the new real part tend to infinity; its two horizontal tails have modulus at most . A circular arc gives the independent bound . The leftward contours give the same two bounds for , after subtracting the residue .
For , integration of on the two omitted tails gives . Taking the smaller of the two preceding bounds proves the stated estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kiran S. Kedlaya, Analytic Number Theory, Lemma 10.2 (standard reference, not scraped)