How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite type-S and type-H prior draws are L2 probability densities
Statement
Every finite type-S draw and every type-H draw in Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families is a well-defined nonnegative probability density.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite type-S coefficient array or a type-H Dirichlet vector, and the bounded finite-level wavelet basis and normalized prior constructions of Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families.
Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families: type S sets for a finite bounded wavelet sum , with ; type H sets on dyadic cells of length , where and .
Proof
For a type-S draw, boundedness of the finite wavelet sum gives , hence on . Therefore , so is finite and is positive and integrates to one. The same bounds make bounded, so .
For type H, each dyadic cell has length , so . Also , since all weights are nonnegative. Thus every type-H draw is a nonnegative probability density.
Depends on
Used by
- Uniform truth under type-S and type-H density priors Example
- Type-H histogram posterior weak Bernstein–von Mises theorem Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Castillo and Nickl, On the Bernstein–von Mises phenomenon for nonparametric Bayes procedures, §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Giné and Nickl, Mathematical Foundations of Infinite-Dimensional Statistical Models, §7.4 Notes (standard reference, not scraped)