How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unboundedly many stationary fibres yield a partition
Statement
In ZFC let be regular uncountable and be regressive, with stationary . If is stationary for every , then has a partition into stationary sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Fodor’s pressing-down lemma: A regressive function on a stationary subset of regular uncountable kappa has a stationary fibre.
Basic stationary-set calculus: Supersets of stationary sets are stationary.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
For each , apply Fodor to the stated stationary tail domain. Its stationary constant subset lies in a fibre with . Thus is unbounded. Regularity gives , so its increasing enumeration has domain kappa.
The fibres at values in B are pairwise disjoint stationary sets. Keep them all, and adjoin every remaining point of S to the fibre at the least value in B. That enlarged fibre remains stationary and disjoint from all the others, and the union is now S.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lietz, Theorem 5.14 proof, case 1 after Claim 5.17, p.44 (standard reference, not scraped)