How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The phase of a sum lies between upper-half-plane phases
Statement
Let and define . For , the phase of lies between and , strictly between them when they are unequal and equal to their common value when they coincide.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
The stability convention is and (Finite-field stability data for an acyclic quiver).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Suppose . Then . Consequently , which, by [F1], gives . Also , so [F1] gives .
If , interchange in step 1.1. If the arguments are equal, are positive real multiples of the same ray, so their sum has that same argument. These cases prove the stated between-phase rule.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Bridgeland, Hall algebras and Donaldson–Thomas invariants, §4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Markus Reineke, The Harder–Narasimhan system in quantum groups and cohomology of quiver moduli, Lemma 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)