How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite acyclic quiver representations: heredity, Euler form, and finite-field finitarity
Statement
Let be a finite acyclic quiver and any field. The category of finite-dimensional representations is abelian. For all , the spaces and Yoneda are finite-dimensional -vector spaces, and The explicit projective resolution below shows that the projective-resolution groups vanish for ; these groups are the cohomology of applying to a projective resolution. If , the displayed vector spaces have finite underlying sets and has a small skeleton (a small full subcategory with one representative of each isomorphism class). Thus is essentially small, and this skeleton is a small finitary abelian category. Yoneda is classified directly below; it is not identified with derived by an unstated theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite acyclic quiver , a field , and .
For every field , is the category of vertexwise vector spaces and arrow maps, and is the displayed Euler form (Finite-field stability data for an acyclic quiver).
A small finitary abelian category has finite Hom sets and finite Yoneda extension-class sets, with endpoint-fixed short-exact-sequence equivalence (Small finitary abelian categories for Hall multiplication).
A morphism between short exact sequences that is the identity on both endpoints is an isomorphism on the middle object (Short five lemma in an abelian category).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
For a morphism , its vertexwise kernels form a subrepresentation: if , then for every arrow . The vertexwise cokernels form a quotient representation because . The kernel and cokernel universal properties hold vertex by vertex. The canonical coimage-to-image map is an isomorphism at every vertex, hence an isomorphism of representations. With vertexwise finite direct sums and a zero object, these facts make abelian.
For , let have basis the directed paths from to , with arrow maps given by path concatenation. Acyclicity and finiteness of make each path set finite. A morphism is uniquely determined by the image of the length-zero path at , so ; evaluation at preserves epimorphisms, and therefore is projective.
Put and define by . Its kernel is exactly by the commuting-square definition of a representation morphism.
For a representation , define by , where is the composite arrow map along the path . Define at a path by Both terms are finite direct sums of the projectives from step 1.2. Then because .
Now assume . For each dimension vector , there are finitely many arrow matrix tuples on the fixed spaces , and the finite group has finitely many orbits on this set. Fix an enumeration of the finite set ; the lexicographically least tuple in each orbit gives a representative without making a choice from an arbitrary family. The union over the set is a set, so the full subcategory on these representatives is small. It is a skeleton: every finite-dimensional representation becomes one of the matrix tuples after choosing bases at its finitely many vertices. The full skeleton is abelian because each vertexwise kernel and cokernel from step 1.1 is isomorphic to its selected representative, and transporting its kernel or cokernel map across that isomorphism preserves the universal property.
At vertex , is onto because is the image of . Modulo , the relation in step 2.1 replaces by . Every positive-length path has a unique first arrow, so repeated replacement sends each path tensor to . Consequently the quotient of the middle term by is isomorphic to through , and .
The map is injective. In a nonzero element of its domain, choose the largest length of a suffix path with nonzero coefficient. The second term of has length . Each such path has a unique first arrow and suffix, so its coefficient cannot cancel with the second term of a different source basis summand. A first term of has length at most , since no source suffix has length . Thus the length- part of is nonzero, proving injectivity. The displayed sequence is a projective resolution of length one; applying therefore gives for .
A short exact sequence splits as a sequence of vector spaces at each of the finitely many vertices. In the resulting coordinates every arrow of has block matrix Every tuple defines such an extension. Changing the vertexwise splittings by changes by . Conversely, an isomorphism of extensions that is the identity on endpoints has block matrix at each vertex and hence changes by exactly . By [F3], the generated endpoint-fixed Yoneda relation consists of these isomorphisms. The Baer sum of the extensions represented by and is represented by : the pullback of their direct sum along followed by pushout along adds the off-diagonal arrow blocks. Pushout along sends to . Therefore the Yoneda vector-space structure is the quotient structure a finite-dimensional -vector space; it is not being identified here with the projective-resolution group of step 4.1.
Both cochain spaces in step 1.3 are finite-dimensional. Rank-nullity for gives The kernel and cokernel identifications already proved give the Hom–Yoneda-Ext formula and finite-dimensionality over any . When , the underlying sets are finite. The full skeleton constructed in step 2.2 has the same Hom sets on its objects; transporting extension middle terms to their representatives identifies its Yoneda classes with those in . Thus this small abelian skeleton satisfies the finitary hypotheses of [F2], while is essentially small.
Depends on
Used by
- Subobject-first Hall completion and quantum tori for finite quivers Definition
- One vertex with no arrows gives the quantum dilogarithm Example
- The A₂ quiver gives the quantum-dilogarithm pentagon Example
- Finite-quiver Hall multiplication counts extensions by automorphism orbits Lemma
- Quiver Harder–Narasimhan filtrations exist, are unique, and descend Lemma
- Euler and skew integration are multiplicative for finite acyclic quivers Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Olivier Schiffmann, Lectures on Hall Algebras, §§1.1, 1.3 and 3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tom Bridgeland, Hall algebras and Donaldson–Thomas invariants, §§2.1 and 3.2–3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)