Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Short five lemma in an abelian category

Statement

Consider a morphism of short exact sequences in an abelian category

0ABC00A0B0C00:ifpghi0p0

Then:

  1. if f and h are monic, then g is monic;
  2. if f and h are epic, then g is epic;
  3. if f and h are isomorphisms, then g is an isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The commutative diagram in the statement, with both rows short exact.

[L1]

Monicity is equivalent to cancellation on members (Monicity by member cancellation).

[L3]

Exactness at a node is equivalent to the member-lifting condition (Exactness is detected by members).

[L4]

Equivalent members admit representatives on a common epic domain. The pullback refinement used for transitivity puts any finite family of such witnesses on one common epic domain, where hom-sets are abelian groups (Equivalence of members, Member equivalence is transitive, Abelian category).

[L5]

The opposite of an abelian category is abelian, and an abelian category is balanced (The opposite of an abelian category is abelian, An abelian category is balanced).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume that f and h are monic. Let y:YB and y:YB be members with gygy. By [L4], choose epimorphisms u:TY and v:TY such that gyu=gyv, and define the member z:=yuyv:TB. Then gz=0. Since hpz=pgz=0 and h is monic, [L1] gives pz0. Exactness of the top row at B now gives a member x of A with ixz by [L3].

L1L3L4assume-hypchooseconstructalgebra
2.1

Since the bottom row is short exact, i is monic. From ifx=gixgz=0 and the monicity of i and f, [L1] gives x0, hence zix0. By [L4], after an epic refinement of T the equality z=yuyv=0 is literal, so the resulting common epic representatives witness yy. Thus [L1] makes g monic.

L1L3L4step 1.1algebra
3.1

If f and h are epic in the original diagram, then fop and hop are monic in the opposite abelian category. Applying steps 1.1 and 2.1 to the opposite morphism of short exact sequences makes gop monic, so g is epic.

L5step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

If f and h are isomorphisms, they are in particular monic and epic. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 make g both monic and epic, so [L5] makes g an isomorphism.

L5step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources