How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Short five lemma in an abelian category
Statement
Consider a morphism of short exact sequences in an abelian category
Then:
- if and are monic, then is monic;
- if and are epic, then is epic;
- if and are isomorphisms, then is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The commutative diagram in the statement, with both rows short exact.
Monicity is equivalent to cancellation on members (Monicity by member cancellation).
Exactness at a node is equivalent to the member-lifting condition (Exactness is detected by members).
Equivalent members admit representatives on a common epic domain. The pullback refinement used for transitivity puts any finite family of such witnesses on one common epic domain, where hom-sets are abelian groups (Equivalence of members, Member equivalence is transitive, Abelian category).
The opposite of an abelian category is abelian, and an abelian category is balanced (The opposite of an abelian category is abelian, An abelian category is balanced).
Proof
Assume that and are monic. Let and be members with . By [L4], choose epimorphisms and such that , and define the member . Then . Since and is monic, [L1] gives . Exactness of the top row at now gives a member of with by [L3].
Since the bottom row is short exact, is monic. From and the monicity of and , [L1] gives , hence . By [L4], after an epic refinement of the equality is literal, so the resulting common epic representatives witness . Thus [L1] makes monic.
If and are epic in the original diagram, then and are monic in the opposite abelian category. Applying steps 1.1 and 2.1 to the opposite morphism of short exact sequences makes monic, so is epic.
If and are isomorphisms, they are in particular monic and epic. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 make both monic and epic, so [L5] makes an isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Lemma VIII.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)