How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homotopy invariance for vector bundles
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) inherited from the proper/quasi-finite and scheme base-change suppliers. Fix a field and let be locally of finite type over . For any rank- vector bundle , flat pullback is bijective, including after every -base change with locally of finite type over . Its inverse is denoted .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; a field ; a scheme locally of finite type over and a rank- vector bundle .
The projective bundle in the quotient convention has tautological quotient with ; the complement of the infinity divisor , cut out by the section of coming from the trivial summand, is canonically , and (The projective bundle formula for Chow groups, Intersection with an invertible sheaf and the first Chern class).
Localization sequence and affine-space homotopy invariance (Localization sequence for Chow groups and homotopy invariance of affine space).
Projective bundle formula on and : the classes form a basis over the corresponding Chow groups, and caps by commute with proper pushforward (The projective bundle formula for Chow groups, Intersection with an invertible sheaf and the first Chern class).
Proof
Compactification and localization. If , and , so pullback and its inverse are the identity after every base change. Assume for the compactification argument. Let be the projective completion with and , and let be the infinity divisor, the zero scheme of the section of induced by the direct-summand . Its complement is , and the restriction of to is ; hence the localization sequence of [L2] gives the exact sequence .
The image of the infinity pushforward. Write . For an integral cycle on , the trivial-summand section cuts the relative hyperplane in the projective completion, with multiplicity one. The Cartier formula therefore gives , and linearity gives this identity for all classes on . Compatibility of the first Chern cap with proper pushforward then yields . Consequently, on the basis over of the source and of the target supplied by [L3], the image of is exactly the span of the positive powers .
Conclusion. By step 2.1 the quotient of by the image of is the direct summand spanned by , and by step 1.1 this quotient is exactly ; since , the induced map is the flat pullback , which is therefore an isomorphism onto the summand spanned by the classes with shifted by . Both bundles and both bases pull back along any -base change with locally of finite type over , so the same computation applies verbatim after base change; the inverse of is by definition .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Chow Homology and Chern Classes, Section 42.36, Lemma 42.36.3 (tag 02TX) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, Math 245 Topics in Algebraic Geometry, Class 6 (standard reference, not scraped)