How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A weak local subharmonic peak function upgrades to regularity
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . Suppose there are a neighbourhood of and a subharmonic function on such that:
- on ;
- as with ;
- writing every compact set satisfies .
Then is regular for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain , a boundary point , and local data and as in the Statement.
A local strict peak function globalizes to a global barrier (A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes).
A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).
Proof
Choose a smaller neighbourhood of . The compact seam is a compact subset of , so hypothesis 3 gives [given, choose] Thus is already a local strict peak function on .
Applying [L1] to the restricted data on yields a global barrier at . Then [L2] shows that is regular.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Harold P. Boas, Class Notes Math 618: Complex Variables II, Spring 2016 (standard reference, not scraped)