How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subharmonic Functions and the Dirichlet Problem
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Harmonic Functions and the Poisson Integral
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page fixes the standard extended-real, upper-semicontinuous convention for plane subharmonicity, proves the comparison, , local-integrability, and stability theorems that make the class workable, and then develops Perron's construction for the bounded plane Dirichlet problem. The second half turns barriers into boundary regularity criteria, proves the exterior-disc and exterior-cone tests, records the complementary-component and boundary-component routes to regularity, and finishes with conformal transport of continuous Dirichlet solutions across closure-homeomorphic biholomorphisms.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
This page uses the standard upper-semicontinuous subharmonic convention
The subharmonic functions on this page take values in , are required to be upper semicontinuous, and are excluded from being identically on any connected component of the domain. This is the standard potential-theoretic convention used by the sources behind the page, and it is the one compatible with for a holomorphic function and with Perron's method for the Dirichlet problem.
The older convention that a subharmonic function is merely a continuous real-valued function satisfying the submean inequality is recovered as the special case where the function never takes the value and happens to be continuous. The harmonic comparison theorems on the page are written so that the harmonic notion from Plane harmonic functions remains the same while the subharmonic class is large enough to include logarithmic singularities.
Subharmonic functions on plane domains
Definition
Let be a complex domain. A function is subharmonic on when:
- is upper semicontinuous;
- on no connected component of is identically ;
- for every closed disc , where the integral is taken in the extended-real sense.
Remarks
The radius is always positive. The value is allowed to be , in which case the submean inequality is automatic.
On a circle, upper semicontinuity gives a finite upper bound, so the integral above can only fail in the downward direction; the next lemma records that the boundary function is Borel and that the average is therefore defined in .
Superharmonic functions on plane domains
Definition
Let be a complex domain. A function is superharmonic on when is subharmonic on in the sense of Subharmonic functions on plane domains.
Remarks
Thus a superharmonic function is lower semicontinuous, may take the value , and is excluded from being identically on a connected component.
Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined
Statement
Let be open and let be upper semicontinuous. Then:
- is Borel measurable;
- for every circle , the boundary function is Borel measurable and bounded above, so its average is a well-defined element of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An upper semicontinuous function and a circle .
The function is upper semicontinuous on , and the circle lies in .
Proof
For every real , the set is open because is upper semicontinuous. Hence the sets are closed, and therefore is Borel measurable.
The circle is compact. If is not identically on , upper semicontinuity gives a point of maximum and therefore a finite upper bound on ; if on , then is already an upper bound. So the boundary function on is Borel measurable and bounded above.
The parametrization is continuous, so composing it with the Borel function from step 1.1 makes Borel measurable on .
A Borel measurable function bounded above on a finite interval has an extended-real integral in , so the displayed circle average is well defined.
Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs
Statement
Let be a complex domain and let . The following are equivalent.
- is subharmonic on .
- is upper semicontinuous, is not identically on any connected component, and for every closed disc and every function continuous on , harmonic on , and satisfying on , one has on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain , a function , and a closed disc .
Subharmonic means upper semicontinuous, not identically on a connected component, and satisfying the circle submean inequality on every closed disc in the domain (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).
For an upper semicontinuous extended-real function, circle boundary values are Borel measurable and bounded above, so decreasing continuous approximants to the boundary data have well-defined circle averages (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined).
Continuous boundary data on the unit circle have a unique continuous harmonic Poisson extension to the closed disc (The Poisson integral on the unit disc, The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc).
Plane harmonic functions satisfy the circle mean-value property, and affine holomorphic changes of coordinate preserve harmonicity, so the unit-disc Poisson solution transports to every Euclidean disc (Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property, Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).
Monotone convergence for the nonnegative integral identifies the limit of the circle integrals of the increasing nonnegative boundary functions with the integral of their pointwise limit (Monotone convergence for the integral).
A subharmonic function that attains a finite interior maximum is constant on its connected component (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).
Proof
Assume condition 1. Let be continuous on , harmonic on , and satisfy on . On define . For and every , the submean inequality for and the circle mean-value property for give [L1, L4, given] Thus is subharmonic on . If some point of satisfied , then upper semicontinuity on the compact disc would make attain a positive interior maximum there, contradicting [L6] because on . Hence on , so throughout the disc. This is condition 2.
Assume condition 2. Fix a closed disc and write on . By [L2], is Borel measurable and bounded above. On the compact circle, define [given, L2, construct] Each is finite and continuous, satisfies , and decreases pointwise to because is upper semicontinuous.
Transporting the Poisson solution from the unit disc by [L3] and [L4], let be the harmonic function on , continuous on , whose boundary values are . Since on , condition 2 gives on . Evaluating at the center and using the Poisson formula at the center of a disc, [step 1.2, L3, L4]
Let be an upper bound for on the circle. Then is an increasing sequence of nonnegative boundary functions, so [L5] gives [step 1.2, step 2.1, L1, L5] Passing to the limit in step 2.1 yields the circle submean inequality at . Since the disc was arbitrary and upper semicontinuity is already part of condition 2, condition 1 follows.
A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative
Statement
Let be open and let . Then is subharmonic on if and only if throughout .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open set and a function .
Subharmonicity on a domain is equivalent to harmonic comparison on every compactly contained disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
Proof
Assume first that is subharmonic. Fix and choose with . For , Taylor's formula in the direction gives [L1, given, algebra] Averaging over kills the linear term and averages the quadratic term to , so the submean inequality yields Dividing by and letting gives .
Assume now that on . Fix a closed disc , and let be continuous on , harmonic on , and satisfy on . Put . Then is continuous on , belongs to , satisfies on , and has on . If some point had , choose and define . On the boundary one has , so attains its maximum at an interior point . The second-derivative test there gives , but a contradiction. Therefore on , so on the whole disc. Since the disc and the harmonic boundary majorant were arbitrary, [L1] shows that is subharmonic on .
Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable
Statement
Every subharmonic function on a complex domain belongs to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A subharmonic function on a complex domain .
On every closed disc inside the domain, a harmonic function that dominates on the boundary dominates throughout the disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
On a compact circle, the boundary values of an upper semicontinuous function are Borel measurable and bounded above, so the circle averages in the submean inequality are finite or (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined).
Every open connected subset of is polygonally connected (For an open subset of , connectedness, path-connectedness and polygonal connectedness are equivalent).
For a nonnegative Borel function on a disc, the polar-coordinate identity follows first for indicators of annular sectors and nonnegative simple functions, and then for general by monotone convergence.
Proof
Fix a compact disc and a smaller concentric disc with . The function is upper semicontinuous on the compact circle , so [L2] gives a finite upper bound there. By the harmonic-comparison theorem [L1], is therefore bounded above on by the harmonic majorant obtained from any continuous boundary majorant on .
The set has empty interior. Suppose instead that for some , and fix any point in the connected component of containing . By [L3], choose a polygonal path in that component from to . Because is compact and lies in the open set , choose with and for every . Subdivide the path by points on with for every . We claim inductively that for all . The case holds because . If and , choose with . Then the circle lies in and meets in an open arc, so on a set of positive arc-length measure on that circle. By [L2], the circle values are Borel measurable and bounded above, hence the circle average is . The submean inequality therefore gives , proving . Since , one has , completing the induction. In particular . Because was arbitrary in the component, this contradicts the subharmonic convention that is not identically there. Thus has empty interior, so every open subdisc contains a point where is finite.
Fix and choose with . Step 1.1, applied with outer radius and inner radius , gives a finite upper bound for on . By step 1.2 choose with , and then choose These inequalities give .
For every , the submean inequality at gives The integrand is nonnegative and Borel by [L2]. Multiply by , integrate from to , and apply [L4] to obtain Thus the negative part of is integrable on , while its positive part is bounded there by . Hence , and therefore .
Every point admits such a disc , so .
The logarithm of the modulus of a holomorphic function is subharmonic
Statement
Let be a complex domain and let be holomorphic on , not identically zero on any connected component. Define with the convention at the zeros of . Then is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A holomorphic function on a complex domain , not identically zero on any connected component.
A real function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative (A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative).
Near a zero of order , the function factors as with holomorphic and (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).
A holomorphic nonvanishing function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm there (A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm).
Holomorphic functions are smooth, so their real and imaginary parts admit the second derivatives used in [L1] (Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates).
Proof
Let be a disc on which has no zeros. By [L3], there is a holomorphic function on with . Writing , one has on . Since is holomorphic and smooth by [L4], the Cauchy-Riemann equations imply , so [L1] makes subharmonic on every zero-free disc.
Fix a zero of , and let . By [L2], on a small disc about one has with . Shrinking if necessary, has no zeros there, so step 1.1 makes harmonic and hence subharmonic on that disc.
On the punctured disc around , [step 2.1, algebra] The function is harmonic on the punctured disc, and at the center its value is while every circle average is finite; hence it is subharmonic there. Therefore the right-hand side is subharmonic on the whole disc, agreeing with away from and with at the center.
Every point of lies either on a zero-free disc covered by step 1.1 or on a zero-containing disc covered by step 3.1. So is subharmonic throughout .
Positive powers of the modulus of a holomorphic function are subharmonic
Statement
Let be holomorphic on a complex domain , not identically zero on any connected component, and let . Then the function is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A holomorphic function on a complex domain , not identically zero on any connected component, and a real number .
The function , with value at the zeros of , is subharmonic (The logarithm of the modulus of a holomorphic function is subharmonic).
Proof
Put . By [L1], for every closed disc , [L1, algebra] Exponentiating and using Jensen's inequality for the convex increasing map gives
The function is continuous, hence upper semicontinuous, and is not identically zero on a connected component because is not identically zero there. Step 1.1 is exactly the submean inequality, so is subharmonic.
Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity
Statement
Let be a complex domain.
- If are subharmonic on and , then is subharmonic on , where terms with are omitted (so an all-zero combination is the zero function).
- If are subharmonic on , then is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Subharmonic functions on a complex domain .
Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
The defining submean inequality for subharmonicity is linear in the function being averaged (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).
A subharmonic function is finite almost everywhere (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable).
Proof
Let . If is empty, the combination is the harmonic zero function. Otherwise it means the well-defined extended-real sum ; no product occurs. Finite sums with positive coefficients preserve upper semicontinuity, and [L3] shows that all summands are finite simultaneously almost everywhere, so their sum is not identically . On any closed disc, multiply the submean inequality for by and sum over to obtain the submean inequality for the combination.
For the finite maximum, upper semicontinuity is preserved by finite maxima. Let and let be continuous on the closure, harmonic on the disc, and satisfy on the boundary. Then on the boundary for every , so [L1] gives throughout the disc for every . Therefore on the disc. Another use of [L1] shows that the maximum is subharmonic.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the two closure properties.
A decreasing limit of plane subharmonic functions is subharmonic or identically -infinity
Statement
Let be a complex domain and let be a decreasing sequence of subharmonic functions on . Put . Then either on , or is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A decreasing sequence of subharmonic functions on a complex domain .
The submean inequality is the defining local condition for subharmonicity (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).
Circle boundary values of upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and bounded above, so a constant may be added to make the decreasing sequence nonnegative on a fixed circle before applying monotone convergence (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined).
Monotone convergence turns an increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions into the limit of their integrals (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Proof
A decreasing limit of upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous, so is upper semicontinuous on . If , the first alternative of the statement holds and there is nothing more to prove. Assume from now on that is finite at least at one point.
Fix a closed disc . For every , [L1] gives [L1, L2, L3, choose] By [L2], the boundary functions are measurable and bounded above. Choose a constant larger than on the circle. Then is an increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions of , so [L3] yields
Passing to the limit in the inequalities of step 1.2 gives [step 1.1, step 1.2, L1] Since the disc was arbitrary and step 1.1 supplied upper semicontinuity, [L1] makes subharmonic.
Upper-semicontinuous regularization
Definition
Let be open and let be any function. Its upper-semicontinuous regularization is
Remarks
The function is upper semicontinuous by construction and satisfies . It is the least upper-semicontinuous majorant of : any upper-semicontinuous with also satisfies .
The upper-semicontinuous regularization of a locally bounded-above subharmonic supremum is subharmonic
Statement
Let be a nonempty family of subharmonic functions on a complex domain , and suppose that for every compact set there is a real number with on for every . Define Then is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally bounded-above family of subharmonic functions on a complex domain .
Finite maxima of subharmonic functions are subharmonic (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).
A function is subharmonic exactly when every harmonic boundary majorant on a compactly contained disc majorizes it throughout that disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
Upper-semicontinuous regularization is the least upper-semicontinuous majorant (Upper-semicontinuous regularization).
Proof
For every compact set , the hypothesis gives a real number with on , so both and are locally bounded above and never take the value . Because is nonempty and every satisfies , the function is not identically on any connected component. By [L3], is upper semicontinuous and satisfies .
Let and let be continuous on the closure, harmonic on the disc, and satisfy on . Because , one also has on the boundary.
Fix any . Since on , [L2] gives on . The same is therefore true for every finite maximum of members of , and [L1] keeps those maxima subharmonic. Taking the supremum over all yields on .
Since is continuous and dominates , it also dominates the least upper-semicontinuous majorant by [L3]. Thus on . Another use of [L2] shows that is subharmonic on .
A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component
Statement
Let be subharmonic on a complex domain . If attains a finite maximum at an interior point of , then is constant on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A subharmonic function on a complex domain and a point with .
Subharmonicity means that every sufficiently small circle average is at least the center value (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).
Proof
Let [given] Because is upper semicontinuous, is closed in , and it is nonempty because .
Choose with . For every , [L1] gives [L1, given] so the average equals . Since the integrand never exceeds , it equals almost everywhere on the circle . If some point of that circle had value , upper semicontinuity would make the value on a short arc, forcing the average below . Hence on every circle with .
Step 1.2 shows that every point of lies in , so is open in . Since is connected and is nonempty, closed, and open, one has . Therefore on .
Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc
Definition
Let be subharmonic on a complex domain , and let be an open disc. A boundary approximation for on is a decreasing sequence of continuous functions with ; such sequences exist because the circle data are upper semicontinuous by Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined.
For each , let be the harmonic function on , continuous on , with boundary values , obtained by transporting the unit-disc Poisson solution of The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc across the affine map and using Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate.
The Poisson modification of on is the function defined by
Remarks
The next theorem proves that the inside function is harmonic, independent of the chosen boundary approximation, and no smaller than the original subharmonic function on .
Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality
Statement
Let be a complex domain, let be open, let be subharmonic on , and let be subharmonic on every connected component of . Assume that for every , Define Then is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain , an open subset , subharmonic functions on and on every component of , and the boundary limsup inequality of the Statement.
Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
Finite maxima preserve subharmonicity (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).
A subharmonic function attaining a finite interior maximum on a connected domain is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).
Proof
On , the function is subharmonic by [L2]. Away from its upper semicontinuity is therefore clear. At , the inside limsup is at most by the hypothesis and upper semicontinuity of , while the outside limsup is at most . Thus is upper semicontinuous on .
Let be a closed disc and let be continuous on , harmonic on , and satisfy on . Because there, [L1] first gives throughout .
Let be a connected component of . On one has . At a boundary point of inside , the seam hypothesis and step 1.2 give . Thus the subharmonic function has boundary limsup at most on the bounded domain . If it were positive somewhere, upper semicontinuity and the boundary bound would make it attain a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L3]. Hence on every such component.
Steps 1.2 and 2.1 give on and on , hence throughout . Every harmonic boundary majorant therefore majorizes , so [L1] and step 1.1 make subharmonic on .
Poisson modification is subharmonic and majorizes the original function
Statement
Let be subharmonic on a complex domain and let be an open disc. Then the Poisson modification of Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc is well defined, subharmonic on , harmonic on , and satisfies on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A subharmonic function on a complex domain and an open disc .
A boundary approximation for produces harmonic functions on with continuous boundary values that decrease pointwise on (Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc, The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc, Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).
If a harmonic function dominates a subharmonic function on the boundary of a compactly contained disc, then it dominates it throughout the disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
Subharmonic pieces glue when the inside boundary limsup is dominated by the outside value (Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality).
An increasing harmonic sequence that is bounded above at one point converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit (An increasing harmonic sequence converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit or diverges to +infinity).
A subharmonic function is locally integrable, so it is finite almost everywhere on every disc in its domain (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable).
Proof
Choose a boundary approximation for , and let be the associated harmonic functions from [L1]. Because on , [L2] gives on for every . The sequence is decreasing because the boundary data are decreasing.
Let be an upper bound for on . Then each is a nonnegative harmonic function on , and the sequence is increasing. By [L5], choose with . Step 1.1 gives , so [L4] applied to yields a harmonic limit on . Consequently is harmonic on .
The inside function is independent of the chosen boundary approximation. Indeed, if is obtained from another approximation , then is harmonic on and its boundary limsup satisfies [step 1.1, step 2.1, L2] for every fixed , hence on the boundary. Applying [L2] to the harmonic function extending gives on for every , so . Symmetry gives .
By step 1.1, on , and by step 3.1 this harmonic function is intrinsic. Moreover, for every and every fixed , one has on and , so [step 1.1, step 2.1] Letting yields .
The Poisson modification equals on and on . Step 4.1 provides the seam inequality, so [L3] shows that is subharmonic on . It is harmonic on by step 2.1, equals outside by definition, and majorizes on by step 4.1. Hence on all of .
The Perron lower family for continuous boundary data
Definition
Let be a bounded complex domain and let be continuous. A function is a Perron lower function for when:
- is subharmonic on ;
- for every ,
The collection of all such functions is the Perron lower family and is denoted .
Remarks
The word lower refers to the boundary condition: members of the family are subharmonic functions that stay below the prescribed boundary datum in the limsup sense.
The Perron envelope and its regularization
Definition
Let be a bounded complex domain and let be continuous. The Perron envelope is the pointwise supremum
Its regularized Perron envelope is defined directly by
Remarks
This limsup is meaningful with values in before any boundedness theorem is used. The next lemma proves , so in the present Perron setting is finite-valued and is exactly the upper-semicontinuous regularization .
The Perron family is nonempty and uniformly bounded by the boundary data
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let be continuous. Put Then:
- is nonempty;
- every satisfies on ;
- the constant function belongs to , so the Perron envelope satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain and a continuous boundary datum .
The Perron lower family consists of subharmonic functions satisfying the boundary limsup inequality against (The Perron lower family for continuous boundary data).
A subharmonic function on a connected domain cannot attain a finite interior maximum unless it is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).
Proof
The constant function is harmonic, hence subharmonic, and its boundary limsup equals . Therefore by [L1], so the Perron family is nonempty.
Let and fix . By the boundary limsup condition in [L1], every boundary point has a neighbourhood such that on . The boundary is compact because is bounded, so finitely many such neighbourhoods cover ; their union leaves a compact set . If exceeded somewhere in , then upper semicontinuity would make attain its maximum over at an interior point with value , contradicting [L2] because is not constant with that value near the boundary collar. Hence on .
Letting in step 1.2 gives on for every . Together with step 1.1, this yields .
The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let be continuous. Then the regularized Perron envelope is harmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain and a continuous boundary datum .
The Perron family is nonempty, every lower function is bounded above by , and the envelope satisfies (The Perron family is nonempty and uniformly bounded by the boundary data).
Poisson modification of a lower function on an interior disc stays subharmonic, is harmonic on that disc, majorizes the original lower function, and is again a lower function because it is unchanged near the outer boundary of (Poisson modification is subharmonic and majorizes the original function, Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc).
Finite maxima preserve subharmonicity and therefore preserve membership in the Perron family (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).
An increasing harmonic sequence bounded above at one point converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit (An increasing harmonic sequence converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit or diverges to +infinity).
The upper-semicontinuous regularization of a locally bounded-above subharmonic supremum is subharmonic (The upper-semicontinuous regularization of a locally bounded-above subharmonic supremum is subharmonic).
A subharmonic function that attains a finite interior maximum is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).
Proof
By [L1], the family is locally bounded above. Applying [L5] to that family shows that is subharmonic on .
Fix and choose a closed disc centered at . By the definition of upper-semicontinuous regularization, choose points with . For each , choose with .
Put . By [L3], each lies in the Perron family, and . Let . By [L2], each is harmonic on , belongs to the Perron family, majorizes , and the sequence is increasing because the sequence is increasing. Step [L1] also gives on .
The sequence is increasing and bounded above at every point by , so [L4] yields a harmonic limit on . Since each belongs to the Perron family, one has , hence on . On the other hand, [step 3.1, L4] Letting and using continuity of and upper semicontinuity of gives .
The function is subharmonic on : both and are harmonic and therefore subharmonic, and [L3] handles sums with positive coefficients. Step 4.1 shows on and vanishes at the interior point , so [L6] forces to be constant on . Hence on , and therefore is harmonic near . Since was arbitrary, is harmonic on .
Barriers and regular boundary points
Definition
Let be a bounded complex domain and let .
A barrier at is a subharmonic function such that:
- as with ;
- for every neighbourhood of there is a constant with
The boundary point is regular when for every continuous boundary datum , the regularized Perron envelope satisfies
Remarks
The barrier is global on , but the second clause is exactly what makes a local peak function sufficient: once one is globalized, it is automatically separated from away from the marked boundary point.
A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . Then is regular if and only if admits a barrier at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain and a boundary point .
For every continuous boundary datum, the regularized Perron envelope is harmonic on (The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic).
A subharmonic function with a finite interior maximum is constant on the connected domain (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).
A barrier at is a negative subharmonic function that tends to at and stays uniformly below a negative constant on the rest of the boundary (Barriers and regular boundary points).
The function is subharmonic because (A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative).
Proof
Assume first that is a barrier at , and let . Put , which is harmonic by [L1]. Fix . Choose a boundary neighbourhood of with on , and choose so large that the negative boundary bound from [L3] forces both [L3, given, choose] for .
Assume conversely that is regular, and define a continuous boundary datum on by . Let , which is harmonic on by [L1]. Regularity gives as . Now let be any member of the Perron family for . By [L4], the function is subharmonic on , so is subharmonic there. For every boundary point , the defining Perron inequality gives If were positive somewhere in , then upper semicontinuity and boundedness of would produce a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L2]. Hence on for every lower function . Taking the supremum over the Perron family and then upper-semicontinuous regularizing yields Now let be any neighbourhood of . The compact set has so the displayed inequality gives Thus is negative on , tends to at , and stays uniformly below a negative constant away from . Hence is a barrier at .
The functions [L2, step 1.1] are subharmonic on because and are harmonic and is subharmonic. Step 1.1 shows that both have boundary limsup at most . If either had a positive value in the interior, upper semicontinuity would produce a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L2]. Hence on .
Step 2.1 gives [step 2.1, L3] Letting inside and using gives Since is arbitrary, . Thus is regular.
Steps 1.1 through 4.1 prove both directions, so is regular exactly when it admits a barrier.
On a regular bounded plane domain, Perron's method solves the Dirichlet problem
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain such that every boundary point is regular. For every continuous boundary datum , the regularized Perron envelope is harmonic on , extends continuously to , agrees with on , and is the unique function with those properties.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain whose every boundary point is regular, and a continuous boundary datum .
The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic on (The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic).
Regularity at a boundary point means that the Perron envelope tends to the prescribed boundary datum there; barriers characterize regular points (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).
A bounded-domain harmonic extension of fixed continuous boundary data is unique (The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution).
Proof
By [L1], is harmonic on . By the hypothesis that every boundary point is regular and the definition packaged in [L2], for every one has [L1, L2, given]
Step 1.1 gives the boundary limits pointwise on , and the continuity of turns those limits into a continuous extension of to by setting the boundary values equal to .
If is any other continuous harmonic function on with on , then [L3] applied to and the extension from step 2.1 gives on . Thus Perron's method solves the Dirichlet problem uniquely on regular bounded plane domains.
Exterior disc points and exterior cone points are regular
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let .
- If there is a closed disc with , then is regular.
- If, after a rigid motion sending to , the domain lies locally in a sector of opening angle , then is regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain and a boundary point .
A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).
A negative local subharmonic peak with a strictly negative bound on a smaller seam globalizes to a barrier (A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes).
Proof
In the exterior-disc case put The center is outside , so and are holomorphic and harmonic respectively on . Moreover for , hence , while as . On the compact set , for any neighbourhood of , the continuous function has a strictly negative maximum: equality could hold only when , namely at . Thus is a global barrier and [L1] makes regular.
In the exterior-cone case, after translation and rotation take and suppose that near the domain lies in Choose with , put , and use the branch of on the larger sector . Then is harmonic and negative on , and tends to at the origin. On a sufficiently small circle , the angular margin gives Thus [L2] globalizes to a barrier, and [L1] gives regularity.
The two barrier constructions prove the two regularity criteria.
A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . Suppose there are a neighbourhood of and a subharmonic function on such that:
- for every ;
- as with ;
- for some smaller neighbourhood of , one has
Then has a global barrier at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain , a boundary point , and local data , , and as in the Statement.
Positive scalar multiples and finite maxima of subharmonic functions are subharmonic (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).
Subharmonic pieces glue across a disc boundary under the limsup inequality (Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality).
Proof
Choose with on , and then choose a constant so large that on . The function is still subharmonic on by [L1], remains negative there, and still tends to at .
Define [L1, L2, step 1.1] Inside the function is subharmonic by [L1]. On the seam one has , so the inside limsup is at most the outside value ; [L2] therefore glues the inside and outside pieces into a global subharmonic function on .
The function is negative on , tends to at because near the maximum chooses the branch, and is identically outside , so it stays uniformly below a negative constant away from . Thus is a global barrier at .
A weak local subharmonic peak function upgrades to regularity
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . Suppose there are a neighbourhood of and a subharmonic function on such that:
- on ;
- as with ;
- writing every compact set satisfies .
Then is regular for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain , a boundary point , and local data and as in the Statement.
A local strict peak function globalizes to a global barrier (A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes).
A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).
Proof
Choose a smaller neighbourhood of . The compact seam is a compact subset of , so hypothesis 3 gives [given, choose] Thus is already a local strict peak function on .
Applying [L1] to the restricted data on yields a global barrier at . Then [L2] shows that is regular.
A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . If the connected component of containing also contains a second point, then is regular for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain , a boundary point , and a second point in the same connected component of as .
For a cycle, the index is locally constant off the trace and vanishes on every connected set in the zero-index region that meets infinity (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).
A complex domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every cycle with trace in it is null-homologous there, equivalently when every holomorphic nowhere-zero function on it has a holomorphic logarithm (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set, Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain).
Harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic changes of coordinate (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).
A weak local subharmonic peak function implies regularity (A weak local subharmonic peak function upgrades to regularity).
Proof
Let lie in the same connected component of as , and let [given, construct] This Möbius map sends to , sends to , and maps biholomorphically onto the domain . Its image is a connected subset of containing both and . Put . Then is an open connected neighbourhood of and .
Let be any cycle whose trace lies in . By [L1], the index is locally constant on and vanishes on the unbounded zero-index region. The connected set is disjoint from , and because also contains , the local constancy from [L1] forces for every . Since , this says exactly that is null-homologous in by [L2]. Therefore is homologically simply connected.
Because is homologically simply connected and misses , [L2] gives a holomorphic logarithm of the identity map on , so for . Hence [L2, step 1.1, construct] Because as through and , choose a small neighbourhood of with . On the function is harmonic, negative, and tends to as through , because . So is a weak local harmonic peak function at for the domain .
The composition is harmonic on by [L3], is negative there, and tends to as through . Thus is a weak local subharmonic peak function at . Applying [L4] shows that is regular for .
A point on a nonsingleton boundary component is regular
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . If the connected component of containing is not a singleton, then is regular for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain and a boundary point whose boundary component contains another point.
If the complementary component of containing contains a second point, then is regular (A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular).
Proof
Let be the connected component of containing , and choose with . Because is connected, it lies in a single connected component of ; that component contains both and .
Step 1.1 puts under the hypothesis of [L1], so is regular for .
Every bounded simply connected proper plane domain is regular
Statement
Let be a bounded proper complex domain whose complement in the Riemann sphere is connected. Then every boundary point of is regular. In the planar working convention of the batch sources, this says that every bounded simply connected proper plane domain is regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded proper complex domain with connected complement in .
If the complementary component of containing a boundary point also contains another point, then that boundary point is regular (A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular).
Proof
Fix . The complement is connected by hypothesis, contains , and also contains because is bounded and proper. Therefore the complementary component containing contains a second point.
Applying [L1] to the boundary point shows that is regular. Since was arbitrary, every boundary point is regular.
Conformal transport of continuous Dirichlet solutions
Statement
Let be bounded regular complex domains, let be a conformal bijection that extends to a homeomorphism , and let be continuous. If is the unique continuous harmonic function on with boundary data , then is the unique continuous harmonic function on with boundary data .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Bounded regular complex domains , a closure-homeomorphic conformal bijection , and a continuous boundary datum .
On a regular bounded plane domain, Perron's method gives the unique continuous harmonic solution of the Dirichlet problem (On a regular bounded plane domain, Perron's method solves the Dirichlet problem).
Harmonicity is preserved under holomorphic changes of coordinate (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).
A bounded-domain continuous harmonic extension of fixed boundary data is unique (The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution).
Proof
By [L1], the source datum has a unique continuous harmonic solution on . Define on . Since is holomorphic on , [L2] makes harmonic on .
The homeomorphic extension of to the closures shows that extends continuously from to . Therefore extends continuously to , and for one has [step 1.1, given] This identifies the transported boundary values.
Let be any other continuous harmonic function on with boundary data . Then is continuous on , harmonic on by [L2], and has boundary values on . By [L3], one has on , hence on .
Thus is exactly the unique Dirichlet solution on with boundary data .
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.