Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

23 results · all verified · 8 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 15 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Subharmonic Functions and the Dirichlet Problem

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page fixes the standard extended-real, upper-semicontinuous convention for plane subharmonicity, proves the comparison, C2, local-integrability, and stability theorems that make the class workable, and then develops Perron's construction for the bounded plane Dirichlet problem. The second half turns barriers into boundary regularity criteria, proves the exterior-disc and exterior-cone tests, records the complementary-component and boundary-component routes to regularity, and finishes with conformal transport of continuous Dirichlet solutions across closure-homeomorphic biholomorphisms.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

This page uses the standard upper-semicontinuous subharmonic convention

The subharmonic functions on this page take values in [,), are required to be upper semicontinuous, and are excluded from being identically on any connected component of the domain. This is the standard potential-theoretic convention used by the sources behind the page, and it is the one compatible with logf for a holomorphic function and with Perron's method for the Dirichlet problem.

The older convention that a subharmonic function is merely a continuous real-valued function satisfying the submean inequality is recovered as the special case where the function never takes the value and happens to be continuous. The harmonic comparison theorems on the page are written so that the harmonic notion from Plane harmonic functions remains the same while the subharmonic class is large enough to include logarithmic singularities.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Subharmonic functions on plane domains

Definition

Let ΩC be a complex domain. A function u:Ω[,) is subharmonic on Ω when:

  1. u is upper semicontinuous;
  2. on no connected component of Ω is u identically ;
  3. for every closed disc D(a,r)Ω, u(a)12π02πu(a+reit)dt, where the integral is taken in the extended-real sense.

Remarks

The radius r is always positive. The value u(a) is allowed to be , in which case the submean inequality is automatic.

On a circle, upper semicontinuity gives a finite upper bound, so the integral above can only fail in the downward direction; the next lemma records that the boundary function is Borel and that the average is therefore defined in [,).

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Superharmonic functions on plane domains

Definition

Let ΩC be a complex domain. A function v:Ω(,] is superharmonic on Ω when v is subharmonic on Ω in the sense of Subharmonic functions on plane domains.

Remarks

Thus a superharmonic function is lower semicontinuous, may take the value +, and is excluded from being identically + on a connected component.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined

Statement

Let ΩC be open and let u:Ω[,) be upper semicontinuous. Then:

  1. u is Borel measurable;
  2. for every circle C={a+reit:0t2π}Ω, the boundary function tu(a+reit) is Borel measurable and bounded above, so its average 12π02πu(a+reit)dt is a well-defined element of [,).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An upper semicontinuous function u:Ω[,) and a circle C={a+reit:0t2π}Ω.

[A1]

The function u is upper semicontinuous on Ω, and the circle C lies in Ω.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every real α, the set {zΩ:u(z)<α} is open because u is upper semicontinuous. Hence the sets {uα} are closed, and therefore u is Borel measurable.

A1
1.2

The circle C is compact. If u is not identically on C, upper semicontinuity gives a point of maximum and therefore a finite upper bound M on C; if u on C, then is already an upper bound. So the boundary function on [0,2π] is Borel measurable and bounded above.

A1
2.1

The parametrization ta+reit is continuous, so composing it with the Borel function from step 1.1 makes tu(a+reit) Borel measurable on [0,2π].

step 1.1
3.1

A Borel measurable function bounded above on a finite interval has an extended-real integral in [,), so the displayed circle average is well defined.

step 2.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain and let u:Ω[,). The following are equivalent.

  1. u is subharmonic on Ω.
  2. u is upper semicontinuous, is not identically on any connected component, and for every closed disc D(a,r)Ω and every function h continuous on D(a,r), harmonic on D(a,r), and satisfying hu on D(a,r), one has hu on D(a,r).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex domain Ω, a function u:Ω[,), and a closed disc D(a,r)Ω.

[L1]

Subharmonic means upper semicontinuous, not identically on a connected component, and satisfying the circle submean inequality on every closed disc in the domain (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

[L2]

For an upper semicontinuous extended-real function, circle boundary values are Borel measurable and bounded above, so decreasing continuous approximants to the boundary data have well-defined circle averages (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined).

[L3]

Continuous boundary data on the unit circle have a unique continuous harmonic Poisson extension to the closed disc (The Poisson integral on the unit disc, The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc).

[L4]

Plane harmonic functions satisfy the circle mean-value property, and affine holomorphic changes of coordinate preserve harmonicity, so the unit-disc Poisson solution transports to every Euclidean disc (Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property, Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).

[L5]

Monotone convergence for the nonnegative integral identifies the limit of the circle integrals of the increasing nonnegative boundary functions Mϕn with the integral of their pointwise limit Mg (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[L6]

A subharmonic function that attains a finite interior maximum is constant on its connected component (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume condition 1. Let h be continuous on D(a,r), harmonic on D(a,r), and satisfy hu on D(a,r). On D(a,r) define v:=uh. For zD(a,r) and every 0<ρ<dist(z,D(a,r)), the submean inequality for u and the circle mean-value property for h give [L1, L4, given] v(z)=u(z)h(z)12π02π(u(z+ρeit)h(z+ρeit))dt. Thus v is subharmonic on D(a,r). If some point of D(a,r) satisfied v>0, then upper semicontinuity on the compact disc would make v attain a positive interior maximum there, contradicting [L6] because v0 on D(a,r). Hence v0 on D(a,r), so hu throughout the disc. This is condition 2.

L1L4L6given
1.2

Assume condition 2. Fix a closed disc D(a,r)Ω and write g(ζ)=u(ζ) on D(a,r). By [L2], g is Borel measurable and bounded above. On the compact circle, define [given, L2, construct] ϕn(ζ):=supηD(a,r)(g(η)nζη). Each ϕn is finite and continuous, satisfies ϕng, and decreases pointwise to g because g is upper semicontinuous.

givenL2construct
2.1

Transporting the Poisson solution from the unit disc by [L3] and [L4], let hn be the harmonic function on D(a,r), continuous on D(a,r), whose boundary values are ϕn. Since ϕng=u on D(a,r), condition 2 gives uhn on D(a,r). Evaluating at the center and using the Poisson formula at the center of a disc, [step 1.2, L3, L4] u(a)hn(a)=12π02πϕn(a+reit)dt.

step 1.2L3L4
3.1

Let M be an upper bound for ϕ1 on the circle. Then Mϕn is an increasing sequence of nonnegative boundary functions, so [L5] gives [step 1.2, step 2.1, L1, L5] limn12π02πϕn(a+reit)dt=12π02πu(a+reit)dt. Passing to the limit in step 2.1 yields the circle submean inequality at a. Since the disc was arbitrary and upper semicontinuity is already part of condition 2, condition 1 follows.

step 1.2step 2.1L1L5
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative

Statement

Let ΩC be open and let uC2(Ω,R). Then u is subharmonic on Ω if and only if Δu=uxx+uyy0 throughout Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set ΩC and a function uC2(Ω,R).

[L1]

Subharmonicity on a domain is equivalent to harmonic comparison on every compactly contained disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume first that u is subharmonic. Fix aΩ and choose r>0 with D(a,r)Ω. For 0<ρ<r, Taylor's formula in the direction eit gives [L1, given, algebra] u(a+ρeit)=u(a)+ρu(a) ⁣ ⁣eit+ρ22eit ⁣T(D2u(a))eit+o(ρ2). Averaging over t kills the linear term and averages the quadratic term to ρ24Δu(a), so the submean inequality yields 012π02πu(a+ρeit)dtu(a)=ρ24Δu(a)+o(ρ2). Dividing by ρ2 and letting ρ0 gives Δu(a)0.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

Assume now that Δu0 on Ω. Fix a closed disc D(a,r)Ω, and let h be continuous on D(a,r), harmonic on D(a,r), and satisfy hu on D(a,r). Put w=uh. Then w is continuous on D(a,r), belongs to C2(D(a,r)), satisfies Δw=Δu0 on D(a,r), and has w0 on D(a,r). If some point pD(a,r) had w(p)>0, choose 0<ε<w(p)/r2 and define wε(z):=w(z)+εza2. On the boundary one has wεεr2<w(p)wε(p), so wε attains its maximum at an interior point qD(a,r). The second-derivative test there gives Δwε(q)0, but Δwε=Δw+4ε4ε>0, a contradiction. Therefore w0 on D(a,r), so uh on the whole disc. Since the disc and the harmonic boundary majorant h were arbitrary, [L1] shows that u is subharmonic on Ω.

L1algebra
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable

Statement

Every subharmonic function on a complex domain belongs to Lloc1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subharmonic function u on a complex domain Ω.

[L1]

On every closed disc inside the domain, a harmonic function that dominates u on the boundary dominates u throughout the disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).

[L2]

On a compact circle, the boundary values of an upper semicontinuous function are Borel measurable and bounded above, so the circle averages in the submean inequality are finite or (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined).

[L4]

For a nonnegative Borel function F on a disc, the polar-coordinate identity D(c,s)FdA=0s02πF(c+teiθ)tdθdt follows first for indicators of annular sectors and nonnegative simple functions, and then for general F by monotone convergence.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix a compact disc D(a,R)Ω and a smaller concentric disc D(a,ρ) with 0<ρ<R. The function u is upper semicontinuous on the compact circle D(a,R), so [L2] gives a finite upper bound there. By the harmonic-comparison theorem [L1], u is therefore bounded above on D(a,ρ) by the harmonic majorant obtained from any continuous boundary majorant on D(a,R).

L1L2given
1.2

The set A={zΩ:u(z)=} has empty interior. Suppose instead that D(c0,R)A for some R>0, and fix any point x in the connected component of Ω containing c0. By [L3], choose a polygonal path γ in that component from c0 to x. Because γ([0,1]) is compact and lies in the open set Ω, choose r>0 with 3r<R and D(y,4r)Ω for every yγ([0,1]). Subdivide the path by points c0,c1,,cN=x on γ with cj+1cj<r/2 for every j. We claim inductively that D(cj,3r)A for all j. The case j=0 holds because 3r<R. If D(cj,3r)A and bD(cj,7r/2), choose ρ with max(0,bcj3r)<ρ<r/2. Then the circle zb=ρ lies in D(cj,4r)Ω and meets D(cj,3r) in an open arc, so u= on a set of positive arc-length measure on that circle. By [L2], the circle values are Borel measurable and bounded above, hence the circle average is . The submean inequality therefore gives u(b)=, proving D(cj,7r/2)A. Since cj+1cj<r/2, one has D(cj+1,3r)D(cj,7r/2)A, completing the induction. In particular xA. Because x was arbitrary in the component, this contradicts the subharmonic convention that u is not identically there. Thus A has empty interior, so every open subdisc contains a point where u is finite.

L2L3givenalgebra
2.1

Fix aΩ and choose r>0 with D(a,3r)Ω. Step 1.1, applied with outer radius 3r and inner radius 2r, gives a finite upper bound M for u on D(a,2r). By step 1.2 choose cD(a,r/2) with u(c)>, and then choose r+ca<s<2rca. These inequalities give D(a,r)D(c,s)D(a,2r).

step 1.1step 1.2choosealgebra
3.1

For every 0<t<s, the submean inequality at c gives 02π(Mu(c+teiθ))dθ2π(Mu(c)). The integrand is nonnegative and Borel by [L2]. Multiply by t, integrate from 0 to s, and apply [L4] to obtain D(c,s)(Mu)dAπs2(Mu(c))<. Thus the negative part of u is integrable on D(c,s), while its positive part is bounded there by M. Hence uL1(D(c,s)), and therefore uL1(D(a,r)).

step 2.1L2L4algebra
4.1

Every point aΩ admits such a disc D(a,r), so uLloc1(Ω).

step 3.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The logarithm of the modulus of a holomorphic function is subharmonic

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain and let f be holomorphic on Ω, not identically zero on any connected component. Define u(z)=logf(z), with the convention u(z)= at the zeros of f. Then u is subharmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic function f on a complex domain Ω, not identically zero on any connected component.

[L1]

A C2 real function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative (A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative).

[L2]

Near a zero a of order m, the function f factors as f(z)=(za)mg(z) with g holomorphic and g(a)0 (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).

[L3]

A holomorphic nonvanishing function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm there (A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm).

[L4]

Holomorphic functions are smooth, so their real and imaginary parts admit the second derivatives used in [L1] (Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let DΩ be a disc on which f has no zeros. By [L3], there is a holomorphic function L on D with expL=f. Writing L=α+iβ, one has α=logf on D. Since L is holomorphic and smooth by [L4], the Cauchy-Riemann equations imply Δα=0, so [L1] makes logf subharmonic on every zero-free disc.

L1L3L4
2.1

Fix a zero a of f, and let m=orda(f). By [L2], on a small disc about a one has f(z)=(za)mg(z) with g(a)0. Shrinking if necessary, g has no zeros there, so step 1.1 makes logg harmonic and hence subharmonic on that disc.

L2step 1.1
3.1

On the punctured disc around a, [step 2.1, algebra] u(z)=mlogza+logg(z). The function logza is harmonic on the punctured disc, and at the center a its value is while every circle average is finite; hence it is subharmonic there. Therefore the right-hand side is subharmonic on the whole disc, agreeing with u away from a and with u(a)= at the center.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

Every point of Ω lies either on a zero-free disc covered by step 1.1 or on a zero-containing disc covered by step 3.1. So u is subharmonic throughout Ω.

step 1.1step 3.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Positive powers of the modulus of a holomorphic function are subharmonic

Statement

Let f be holomorphic on a complex domain Ω, not identically zero on any connected component, and let p>0. Then the function zf(z)p is subharmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic function f on a complex domain Ω, not identically zero on any connected component, and a real number p>0.

[L1]

The function logf, with value at the zeros of f, is subharmonic (The logarithm of the modulus of a holomorphic function is subharmonic).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put u=logf. By [L1], for every closed disc D(a,r)Ω, [L1, algebra] u(a)12π02πu(a+reit)dt. Exponentiating and using Jensen's inequality for the convex increasing map xepx gives f(a)p=epu(a)12π02πepu(a+reit)dt=12π02πf(a+reit)pdt.

L1algebra
2.1

The function fp is continuous, hence upper semicontinuous, and is not identically zero on a connected component because f is not identically zero there. Step 1.1 is exactly the submean inequality, so fp is subharmonic.

step 1.1given
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain.

  1. If u1,,um are subharmonic on Ω and α1,,αm0, then α1u1++αmum is subharmonic on Ω, where terms with αj=0 are omitted (so an all-zero combination is the zero function).
  2. If u1,,um are subharmonic on Ω, then u(z)=max{u1(z),,um(z)} is subharmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Subharmonic functions u1,,um on a complex domain Ω.

[L1]

Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).

[L2]

The defining submean inequality for subharmonicity is linear in the function being averaged (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

[L3]

A subharmonic function is finite almost everywhere (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let I={j:αj>0}. If I is empty, the combination is the harmonic zero function. Otherwise it means the well-defined extended-real sum jIαjuj; no product 0() occurs. Finite sums with positive coefficients preserve upper semicontinuity, and [L3] shows that all summands are finite simultaneously almost everywhere, so their sum is not identically . On any closed disc, multiply the submean inequality for uj by αj>0 and sum over I to obtain the submean inequality for the combination.

givenL2L3algebra
1.2

For the finite maximum, upper semicontinuity is preserved by finite maxima. Let D(a,r)Ω and let h be continuous on the closure, harmonic on the disc, and satisfy hmax(u1,,um) on the boundary. Then huj on the boundary for every j, so [L1] gives huj throughout the disc for every j. Therefore hmax(u1,,um) on the disc. Another use of [L1] shows that the maximum is subharmonic.

L1given
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the two closure properties.

step 1.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A decreasing limit of plane subharmonic functions is subharmonic or identically -infinity

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain and let u1u2 be a decreasing sequence of subharmonic functions on Ω. Put u(z)=limnun(z). Then either u on Ω, or u is subharmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A decreasing sequence (un) of subharmonic functions on a complex domain Ω.

[L1]

The submean inequality is the defining local condition for subharmonicity (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

[L2]

Circle boundary values of upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and bounded above, so a constant may be added to make the decreasing sequence nonnegative on a fixed circle before applying monotone convergence (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined).

[L3]

Monotone convergence turns an increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions into the limit of their integrals (Monotone convergence for the integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A decreasing limit of upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous, so u is upper semicontinuous on Ω. If u, the first alternative of the statement holds and there is nothing more to prove. Assume from now on that u is finite at least at one point.

given
1.2

Fix a closed disc D(a,r)Ω. For every n, [L1] gives [L1, L2, L3, choose] un(a)12π02πun(a+reit)dt. By [L2], the boundary functions are measurable and bounded above. Choose a constant M larger than u1 on the circle. Then Mun(a+reit) is an increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions of t, so [L3] yields limn12π02πun(a+reit)dt=12π02πu(a+reit)dt.

L1L2L3choose
2.1

Passing to the limit in the inequalities of step 1.2 gives [step 1.1, step 1.2, L1] u(a)12π02πu(a+reit)dt. Since the disc was arbitrary and step 1.1 supplied upper semicontinuity, [L1] makes u subharmonic.

step 1.1step 1.2L1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Upper-semicontinuous regularization

Definition

Let ΩC be open and let v:Ω[,) be any function. Its upper-semicontinuous regularization is v(z):=lim supwzv(w)=limρ0sup{v(w):wz<ρ, wΩ}.

Remarks

The function v is upper semicontinuous by construction and satisfies vv. It is the least upper-semicontinuous majorant of v: any upper-semicontinuous g with vg also satisfies vg.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The upper-semicontinuous regularization of a locally bounded-above subharmonic supremum is subharmonic

Statement

Let F be a nonempty family of subharmonic functions on a complex domain Ω, and suppose that for every compact set KΩ there is a real number MK with vMK on K for every vF. Define u(z)=supvFv(z),U=u. Then U is subharmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally bounded-above family F of subharmonic functions on a complex domain Ω.

[L1]

Finite maxima of subharmonic functions are subharmonic (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).

[L2]

A function is subharmonic exactly when every harmonic boundary majorant on a compactly contained disc majorizes it throughout that disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).

[L3]

Upper-semicontinuous regularization is the least upper-semicontinuous majorant (Upper-semicontinuous regularization).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every compact set KΩ, the hypothesis gives a real number MK with uMK on K, so both u and U=u are locally bounded above and never take the value +. Because F is nonempty and every vF satisfies vuU, the function U is not identically on any connected component. By [L3], U is upper semicontinuous and satisfies uU.

givenL3
2.1

Let D(a,r)Ω and let h be continuous on the closure, harmonic on the disc, and satisfy hU on D(a,r). Because uU, one also has hu on the boundary.

step 1.1given
3.1

Fix any vF. Since hv on D(a,r), [L2] gives hv on D(a,r). The same is therefore true for every finite maximum of members of F, and [L1] keeps those maxima subharmonic. Taking the supremum over all vF yields hu on D(a,r).

L1L2step 2.1
4.1

Since h is continuous and dominates u, it also dominates the least upper-semicontinuous majorant U by [L3]. Thus hU on D(a,r). Another use of [L2] shows that U is subharmonic on Ω.

L2L3step 3.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component

Statement

Let u be subharmonic on a complex domain Ω. If u attains a finite maximum at an interior point of Ω, then u is constant on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subharmonic function u on a complex domain Ω and a point aΩ with u(a)=M=supΩu<.

[L1]

Subharmonicity means that every sufficiently small circle average is at least the center value (Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let [given] S={zΩ:u(z)=M}. Because u is upper semicontinuous, S is closed in Ω, and it is nonempty because aS.

given
1.2

Choose r>0 with D(a,r)Ω. For every 0<ρ<r, [L1] gives [L1, given] M=u(a)12π02πu(a+ρeit)dtM, so the average equals M. Since the integrand never exceeds M, it equals M almost everywhere on the circle za=ρ. If some point of that circle had value <M, upper semicontinuity would make the value <M on a short arc, forcing the average below M. Hence uM on every circle za=ρ with 0<ρ<r.

L1given
2.1

Step 1.2 shows that every point of D(a,r) lies in S, so S is open in Ω. Since Ω is connected and S is nonempty, closed, and open, one has S=Ω. Therefore uM on Ω.

step 1.1step 1.2
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc

Definition

Let u be subharmonic on a complex domain Ω, and let D=D(a,r)Ω be an open disc. A boundary approximation for u on D is a decreasing sequence of continuous functions ϕn:DR with ϕnuD; such sequences exist because the circle data are upper semicontinuous by Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined.

For each n, let hn be the harmonic function on D, continuous on D, with boundary values ϕn, obtained by transporting the unit-disc Poisson solution of The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc across the affine map z(za)/r and using Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate.

The Poisson modification of u on D is the function PDu defined by PDu(z)={infnhn(z),zD,u(z),zΩD.

Remarks

The next theorem proves that the inside function infnhn is harmonic, independent of the chosen boundary approximation, and no smaller than the original subharmonic function on D.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain, let DΩ be open, let u be subharmonic on Ω, and let v be subharmonic on every connected component of D. Assume that for every ζDΩ, lim supzζzDv(z)u(ζ). Define w(z)={max{u(z),v(z)},zD,u(z),zΩD. Then w is subharmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex domain Ω, an open subset DΩ, subharmonic functions u on Ω and v on every component of D, and the boundary limsup inequality of the Statement.

[L1]

Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).

[L3]

A subharmonic function attaining a finite interior maximum on a connected domain is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

On D, the function w=max{u,v} is subharmonic by [L2]. Away from D its upper semicontinuity is therefore clear. At ζDΩ, the inside limsup is at most u(ζ) by the hypothesis and upper semicontinuity of u, while the outside limsup is at most u(ζ)=w(ζ). Thus w is upper semicontinuous on Ω.

givenL2
1.2

Let BΩ be a closed disc and let h be continuous on B, harmonic on B, and satisfy hw on B. Because wu there, [L1] first gives hu throughout B.

L1given
2.1

Let C be a connected component of BD. On CB one has hwv. At a boundary point of C inside B, the seam hypothesis and step 1.2 give lim supC(vh)uh0. Thus the subharmonic function vh has boundary limsup at most 0 on the bounded domain C. If it were positive somewhere, upper semicontinuity and the boundary bound would make it attain a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L3]. Hence hv on every such component.

step 1.2L3given
3.1

Steps 1.2 and 2.1 give hu on B and hv on BD, hence hw throughout B. Every harmonic boundary majorant therefore majorizes w, so [L1] and step 1.1 make w subharmonic on Ω.

L1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Poisson modification is subharmonic and majorizes the original function

Statement

Let u be subharmonic on a complex domain Ω and let DΩ be an open disc. Then the Poisson modification PDu of Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc is well defined, subharmonic on Ω, harmonic on D, and satisfies PDuu on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subharmonic function u on a complex domain Ω and an open disc DΩ.

[L1]

A boundary approximation for uD produces harmonic functions hn on D with continuous boundary values ϕn that decrease pointwise on D (Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc, The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc, Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).

[L2]

If a harmonic function dominates a subharmonic function on the boundary of a compactly contained disc, then it dominates it throughout the disc (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).

[L3]

Subharmonic pieces glue when the inside boundary limsup is dominated by the outside value (Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality).

[L4]

An increasing harmonic sequence that is bounded above at one point converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit (An increasing harmonic sequence converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit or diverges to +infinity).

[L5]

A subharmonic function is locally integrable, so it is finite almost everywhere on every disc in its domain (Plane subharmonic functions are locally integrable).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a boundary approximation (ϕn) for uD, and let hn be the associated harmonic functions from [L1]. Because ϕnu on D, [L2] gives hnu on D for every n. The sequence (hn) is decreasing because the boundary data are decreasing.

L1L2givenchoose
2.1

Let M be an upper bound for ϕ1 on D. Then each Mhn is a nonnegative harmonic function on D, and the sequence (Mhn) is increasing. By [L5], choose z0D with u(z0)>. Step 1.1 gives 0Mhn(z0)Mu(z0), so [L4] applied to (Mhn) yields a harmonic limit H on D. Consequently h:=MH=infnhn is harmonic on D.

step 1.1L4L5choose
3.1

The inside function h is independent of the chosen boundary approximation. Indeed, if k is obtained from another approximation (ψm), then h is harmonic on D and its boundary limsup satisfies [step 1.1, step 2.1, L2] lim supzζzDh(z)ϕn(ζ)(ζD) for every fixed n, hence lim suphuψm on the boundary. Applying [L2] to the harmonic function km extending ψm gives hkm on D for every m, so hk. Symmetry gives kh.

step 1.1step 2.1L2
4.1

By step 1.1, hu on D, and by step 3.1 this harmonic function is intrinsic. Moreover, for every ζD and every fixed n, one has hhn on D and hn(ζ)=ϕn(ζ), so [step 1.1, step 2.1] lim supzζzDh(z)ϕn(ζ). Letting n yields lim supzζ, zDh(z)u(ζ).

step 1.1step 2.1
5.1

The Poisson modification equals h on D and u on ΩD. Step 4.1 provides the seam inequality, so [L3] shows that PDu is subharmonic on Ω. It is harmonic on D by step 2.1, equals u outside D by definition, and majorizes u on D by step 4.1. Hence PDuu on all of Ω.

L3step 2.1step 4.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The Perron lower family for continuous boundary data

Definition

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let φ:ΩR be continuous. A function v:Ω[,) is a Perron lower function for (Ω,φ) when:

  1. v is subharmonic on Ω;
  2. for every ζΩ, lim supzζzΩv(z)φ(ζ).

The collection of all such functions is the Perron lower family and is denoted P(φ,Ω).

Remarks

The word lower refers to the boundary condition: members of the family are subharmonic functions that stay below the prescribed boundary datum in the limsup sense.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The Perron envelope and its regularization

Definition

Let Ω be a bounded complex domain and let φ:ΩR be continuous. The Perron envelope is the pointwise supremum Uφ(z):=sup{v(z):vP(φ,Ω)},zΩ.

Its regularized Perron envelope is defined directly by Hφ(z):=limρ0sup{Uφ(w):wΩ, wz<ρ}.

Remarks

This limsup is meaningful with values in [,+] before any boundedness theorem is used. The next lemma proves minΩφUφmaxΩφ, so in the present Perron setting Hφ is finite-valued and is exactly the upper-semicontinuous regularization Uφ.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The Perron family is nonempty and uniformly bounded by the boundary data

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let φ:ΩR be continuous. Put m=minΩφ,M=maxΩφ. Then:

  1. P(φ,Ω) is nonempty;
  2. every vP(φ,Ω) satisfies vM on Ω;
  3. the constant function m belongs to P(φ,Ω), so the Perron envelope satisfies mUφM.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω and a continuous boundary datum φ:ΩR.

[L1]

The Perron lower family consists of subharmonic functions satisfying the boundary limsup inequality against φ (The Perron lower family for continuous boundary data).

[L2]

A subharmonic function on a connected domain cannot attain a finite interior maximum unless it is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The constant function m is harmonic, hence subharmonic, and its boundary limsup equals mφ. Therefore mP(φ,Ω) by [L1], so the Perron family is nonempty.

L1given
1.2

Let vP(φ,Ω) and fix ε>0. By the boundary limsup condition in [L1], every boundary point ζ has a neighbourhood Uζ such that vM+ε on UζΩ. The boundary is compact because Ω is bounded, so finitely many such neighbourhoods cover Ω; their union leaves a compact set KΩ. If v exceeded M+ε somewhere in Ω, then upper semicontinuity would make v attain its maximum over K at an interior point with value >M+ε, contradicting [L2] because v is not constant with that value near the boundary collar. Hence vM+ε on Ω.

L1L2given
2.1

Letting ε0 in step 1.2 gives vM on Ω for every vP(φ,Ω). Together with step 1.1, this yields mUφM.

step 1.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let φ:ΩR be continuous. Then the regularized Perron envelope Hφ is harmonic on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω and a continuous boundary datum φ:ΩR.

[L1]

The Perron family is nonempty, every lower function is bounded above by M=maxΩφ, and the envelope satisfies mUφM (The Perron family is nonempty and uniformly bounded by the boundary data).

[L2]

Poisson modification of a lower function on an interior disc stays subharmonic, is harmonic on that disc, majorizes the original lower function, and is again a lower function because it is unchanged near the outer boundary of Ω (Poisson modification is subharmonic and majorizes the original function, Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc).

[L3]

Finite maxima preserve subharmonicity and therefore preserve membership in the Perron family (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).

[L4]

An increasing harmonic sequence bounded above at one point converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit (An increasing harmonic sequence converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit or diverges to +infinity).

[L5]

The upper-semicontinuous regularization of a locally bounded-above subharmonic supremum is subharmonic (The upper-semicontinuous regularization of a locally bounded-above subharmonic supremum is subharmonic).

[L6]

A subharmonic function that attains a finite interior maximum is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the family P(φ,Ω) is locally bounded above. Applying [L5] to that family shows that Hφ is subharmonic on Ω.

L1L5
2.1

Fix z0Ω and choose a closed disc DΩ centered at z0. By the definition of upper-semicontinuous regularization, choose points znz0 with Uφ(zn)>Hφ(z0)1/n. For each n, choose vnP(φ,Ω) with vn(zn)>Uφ(zn)1/n.

step 1.1givenchoose
3.1

Put wn=max(v1,,vn). By [L3], each wn lies in the Perron family, and wn(zn)>Hφ(z0)1/n. Let hn=PDwn. By [L2], each hn is harmonic on D, belongs to the Perron family, majorizes wn, and the sequence (hn) is increasing because the sequence (wn) is increasing. Step [L1] also gives hnM on D.

L1L2L3step 2.1
4.1

The sequence (hn) is increasing and bounded above at every point by M, so [L4] yields a harmonic limit h on D. Since each hn belongs to the Perron family, one has hnUφHφ, hence hHφ on D. On the other hand, [step 3.1, L4] Hφ(z0)1n<hn(zn)h(zn)Hφ(zn). Letting n and using continuity of h and upper semicontinuity of Hφ gives h(z0)=Hφ(z0).

step 3.1L4
5.1

The function Hφh is subharmonic on D: both h and h are harmonic and therefore subharmonic, and [L3] handles sums with positive coefficients. Step 4.1 shows Hφh0 on D and vanishes at the interior point z0, so [L6] forces Hφh to be constant 0 on D. Hence Hφ=h on D, and therefore Hφ is harmonic near z0. Since z0 was arbitrary, Hφ is harmonic on Ω.

L3L6step 1.1step 4.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Barriers and regular boundary points

Definition

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ.

A barrier at ζ is a subharmonic function b:Ω[,0) such that:

  1. b(z)0 as zζ with zΩ;
  2. for every neighbourhood V of ζ there is a constant cV<0 with lim supzηzΩb(z)cV(ηΩV).

The boundary point ζ is regular when for every continuous boundary datum φ:ΩR, the regularized Perron envelope Hφ satisfies limzζzΩHφ(z)=φ(ζ).

Remarks

The barrier is global on Ω, but the second clause is exactly what makes a local peak function sufficient: once one is globalized, it is automatically separated from 0 away from the marked boundary point.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ. Then ζ is regular if and only if Ω admits a barrier at ζ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω and a boundary point ζΩ.

[L1]

For every continuous boundary datum, the regularized Perron envelope is harmonic on Ω (The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic).

[L2]

A subharmonic function with a finite interior maximum is constant on the connected domain (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).

[L3]

A barrier at ζ is a negative subharmonic function that tends to 0 at ζ and stays uniformly below a negative constant on the rest of the boundary (Barriers and regular boundary points).

[L4]

The C2 function q(z)=zζ2 is subharmonic because Δq=40 (A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume first that b is a barrier at ζ, and let φC(Ω). Put H=Hφ, which is harmonic by [L1]. Fix ε>0. Choose a boundary neighbourhood V of ζ with φ(η)φ(ζ)<ε on VΩ, and choose A>0 so large that the negative boundary bound from [L3] forces both [L3, given, choose] φ(η)φ(ζ)ε+Alim supb(η)0,φ(η)+φ(ζ)ε+Alim supb(η)0 for ηΩV.

L3givenchoose
1.2

Assume conversely that ζ is regular, and define a continuous boundary datum on Ω by ψ(η)=ηζ2. Let B=Hψ, which is harmonic on Ω by [L1]. Regularity gives B(z)ψ(ζ)=0 as zζ. Now let v be any member of the Perron family for ψ. By [L4], the function q(z)=zζ2 is subharmonic on Ω, so v+q is subharmonic there. For every boundary point ηΩ, the defining Perron inequality gives lim supzηzΩ(v(z)+q(z))ψ(η)+ηζ2=0. If v+q were positive somewhere in Ω, then upper semicontinuity and boundedness of Ω would produce a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L2]. Hence v(z)zζ2 on Ω for every lower function v. Taking the supremum over the Perron family and then upper-semicontinuous regularizing yields B(z)zζ2<0(zΩ). Now let V be any neighbourhood of ζ. The compact set ΩV has δV:=minηΩVηζ2>0, so the displayed inequality gives lim supzηzΩB(z)δV(ηΩV). Thus B is negative on Ω, tends to 0 at ζ, and stays uniformly below a negative constant away from ζ. Hence B is a barrier at ζ.

L1L2L4given
2.1

The functions [L2, step 1.1] s+(z)=H(z)φ(ζ)ε+Ab(z),s(z)=H(z)+φ(ζ)ε+Ab(z) are subharmonic on Ω because H and H are harmonic and b is subharmonic. Step 1.1 shows that both have boundary limsup at most 0. If either had a positive value in the interior, upper semicontinuity would produce a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L2]. Hence s±0 on Ω.

L2step 1.1
3.1

Step 2.1 gives [step 2.1, L3] φ(ζ)ε+Ab(z)H(z)φ(ζ)+εAb(z). Letting zζ inside Ω and using b(z)0 gives φ(ζ)εlim infΩzζH(z)lim supΩzζH(z)φ(ζ)+ε. Since ε is arbitrary, H(z)φ(ζ). Thus ζ is regular.

step 2.1L3
4.1

Steps 1.1 through 4.1 prove both directions, so ζ is regular exactly when it admits a barrier.

step 3.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

On a regular bounded plane domain, Perron's method solves the Dirichlet problem

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain such that every boundary point is regular. For every continuous boundary datum φ:ΩR, the regularized Perron envelope Hφ is harmonic on Ω, extends continuously to Ω, agrees with φ on Ω, and is the unique function with those properties.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω whose every boundary point is regular, and a continuous boundary datum φ:ΩR.

[L1]

The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic on Ω (The regularized Perron envelope is harmonic).

[L2]

Regularity at a boundary point means that the Perron envelope tends to the prescribed boundary datum there; barriers characterize regular points (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).

[L3]

A bounded-domain harmonic extension of fixed continuous boundary data is unique (The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], Hφ is harmonic on Ω. By the hypothesis that every boundary point is regular and the definition packaged in [L2], for every ζΩ one has [L1, L2, given] limzζzΩHφ(z)=φ(ζ).

L1L2given
2.1

Step 1.1 gives the boundary limits pointwise on Ω, and the continuity of φ turns those limits into a continuous extension of Hφ to Ω by setting the boundary values equal to φ.

step 1.1given
3.1

If u is any other continuous harmonic function on Ω with u=φ on Ω, then [L3] applied to u and the extension from step 2.1 gives u=Hφ on Ω. Thus Perron's method solves the Dirichlet problem uniquely on regular bounded plane domains.

step 2.1L3
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Exterior disc points and exterior cone points are regular

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ.

  1. If there is a closed disc B(c,R)CΩ with ζB(c,R), then ζ is regular.
  2. If, after a rigid motion sending ζ to 0, the domain lies locally in a sector of opening angle <π, then ζ is regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω and a boundary point ζΩ.

[L1]

A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).

[L2]

A negative local subharmonic peak with a strictly negative bound on a smaller seam globalizes to a barrier (A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

In the exterior-disc case put Φ(z)=ζczc,b(z)=ReΦ(z)1. The center c is outside Ω, so Φ and b are holomorphic and harmonic respectively on Ω. Moreover Φ(z)=R/zc<1 for zΩ, hence b<0, while b(z)0 as zζ. On the compact set ΩV, for any neighbourhood V of ζ, the continuous function ReΦ1 has a strictly negative maximum: equality could hold only when Φ=1, namely at z=ζ. Thus b is a global barrier and [L1] makes ζ regular.

L1givenconstruct
1.2

In the exterior-cone case, after translation and rotation take ζ=0 and suppose that near 0 the domain lies in S={reit:0<r<r0, t<θ},0<θ<π/2. Choose θ with θ<θ<π/2, put λ=π/(2θ), and use the branch of zλ on the larger sector t<θ. Then q(z)=Re(zλ) is harmonic and negative on ΩS, and tends to 0 at the origin. On a sufficiently small circle z=ρ, the angular margin gives q(z)ρλcos(λθ)<0(zΩD(0,ρ)). Thus [L2] globalizes q to a barrier, and [L1] gives regularity.

L1L2givenconstruct
2.1

The two barrier constructions prove the two regularity criteria.

step 1.1step 1.2
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ. Suppose there are a neighbourhood U of ζ and a subharmonic function q on ΩU such that:

  1. q(z)<0 for every zΩU;
  2. q(z)0 as zζ with zΩ;
  3. for some smaller neighbourhood WU of ζ, one has sup{q(z):zΩW}<0.

Then Ω has a global barrier at ζ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω, a boundary point ζ, and local data U, W, and q as in the Statement.

[L1]

Positive scalar multiples and finite maxima of subharmonic functions are subharmonic (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).

[L2]

Subharmonic pieces glue across a disc boundary under the limsup inequality (Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose η>0 with qη on ΩW, and then choose a constant c>0 so large that cq1 on ΩW. The function cq is still subharmonic on ΩW by [L1], remains negative there, and still tends to 0 at ζ.

L1givenchoose
2.1

Define [L1, L2, step 1.1] b(z)={max{cq(z),1},zΩW,1,zΩW. Inside ΩW the function is subharmonic by [L1]. On the seam W one has cq1, so the inside limsup is at most the outside value 1; [L2] therefore glues the inside and outside pieces into a global subharmonic function on Ω.

L1L2step 1.1
3.1

The function b is negative on Ω, tends to 0 at ζ because near ζ the maximum chooses the cq branch, and is identically 1 outside W, so it stays uniformly below a negative constant away from ζ. Thus b is a global barrier at ζ.

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A weak local subharmonic peak function upgrades to regularity

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ. Suppose there are a neighbourhood U of ζ and a subharmonic function q on ΩU such that:

  1. q(z)<0 on ΩU;
  2. q(z)0 as zζ with zΩ;
  3. writing q(η):=lim supzηzΩUq(z)(ηΩU), every compact set K(ΩU){ζ} satisfies supηKq(η)<0.

Then ζ is regular for Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω, a boundary point ζ, and local data U and q as in the Statement.

[L1]

A local strict peak function globalizes to a global barrier (A local strict subharmonic peak function globalizes).

[L2]

A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier (A boundary point is regular exactly when it admits a barrier).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a smaller neighbourhood WU of ζ. The compact seam (ΩW)W is a compact subset of (ΩU){ζ}, so hypothesis 3 gives [given, choose] supη(ΩW)Wq(η)<0. Thus q is already a local strict peak function on ΩW.

givenchoose
2.1

Applying [L1] to the restricted data on W yields a global barrier at ζ. Then [L2] shows that ζ is regular.

L1L2step 1.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ. If the connected component of C^Ω containing ζ also contains a second point, then ζ is regular for Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω, a boundary point ζΩ, and a second point in the same connected component of C^Ω as ζ.

[L1]

For a cycle, the index is locally constant off the trace and vanishes on every connected set in the zero-index region that meets infinity (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).

[L2]

A complex domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every cycle with trace in it is null-homologous there, equivalently when every holomorphic nowhere-zero function on it has a holomorphic logarithm (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set, Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain).

[L3]

Harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic changes of coordinate (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).

[L4]

A weak local subharmonic peak function implies regularity (A weak local subharmonic peak function upgrades to regularity).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let aζ lie in the same connected component E of C^Ω as ζ, and let [given, construct] T(w)=wζwa. This Möbius map sends ζ to 0, sends a to , and maps Ω biholomorphically onto the domain Ω=T(Ω). Its image E=T(E) is a connected subset of C^Ω containing both 0 and . Put G=C^E. Then G is an open connected neighbourhood of Ω and 0G.

givenconstruct
2.1

Let Γ be any cycle whose trace lies in G. By [L1], the index n(Γ,) is locally constant on CΓ and vanishes on the unbounded zero-index region. The connected set EC is disjoint from Γ, and because E also contains , the local constancy from [L1] forces n(Γ,p)=0 for every pEC. Since E=C^G, this says exactly that Γ is null-homologous in G by [L2]. Therefore G is homologically simply connected.

L1L2step 1.1
2.2

Because G is homologically simply connected and misses 0, [L2] gives a holomorphic logarithm L of the identity map on G, so exp(L(w))=w for wG. Hence [L2, step 1.1, construct] ReL(w)=logw. Because T(z)0 as zζ through Ω and 0Ω, choose a small neighbourhood V of 0 with ΩV{0<w<1}. On ΩV the function q(w)=Re1L(w) is harmonic, negative, and tends to 0 as w0 through Ω, because ReL(w)=logw. So q is a weak local harmonic peak function at 0 for the domain Ω.

L2step 1.1construct
3.1

The composition qT is harmonic on ΩT1(V) by [L3], is negative there, and tends to 0 as zζ through Ω. Thus qT is a weak local subharmonic peak function at ζ. Applying [L4] shows that ζ is regular for Ω.

L3L4step 2.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A point on a nonsingleton boundary component is regular

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded complex domain and let ζΩ. If the connected component of Ω containing ζ is not a singleton, then ζ is regular for Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded complex domain Ω and a boundary point ζΩ whose boundary component contains another point.

[L1]

If the complementary component of C^Ω containing ζ contains a second point, then ζ is regular (A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let C be the connected component of Ω containing ζ, and choose aC with aζ. Because CC^Ω is connected, it lies in a single connected component of C^Ω; that component contains both ζ and a.

givenchoose
2.1

Step 1.1 puts ζ under the hypothesis of [L1], so ζ is regular for Ω.

L1step 1.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Every bounded simply connected proper plane domain is regular

Statement

Let ΩC be a bounded proper complex domain whose complement in the Riemann sphere C^ is connected. Then every boundary point of Ω is regular. In the planar working convention of the batch sources, this says that every bounded simply connected proper plane domain is regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded proper complex domain Ω with connected complement in C^.

[L1]

If the complementary component of C^Ω containing a boundary point also contains another point, then that boundary point is regular (A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix ζΩ. The complement C^Ω is connected by hypothesis, contains ζ, and also contains because Ω is bounded and proper. Therefore the complementary component containing ζ contains a second point.

given
2.1

Applying [L1] to the boundary point ζ shows that ζ is regular. Since ζ was arbitrary, every boundary point is regular.

L1step 1.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Conformal transport of continuous Dirichlet solutions

Statement

Let Ω,ΩC be bounded regular complex domains, let F:ΩΩ be a conformal bijection that extends to a homeomorphism ΩΩ, and let φ:ΩR be continuous. If u is the unique continuous harmonic function on Ω with boundary data φFΩ, then v:=uF1 is the unique continuous harmonic function on Ω with boundary data φ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Bounded regular complex domains Ω,Ω, a closure-homeomorphic conformal bijection F:ΩΩ, and a continuous boundary datum φ:ΩR.

[L1]

On a regular bounded plane domain, Perron's method gives the unique continuous harmonic solution of the Dirichlet problem (On a regular bounded plane domain, Perron's method solves the Dirichlet problem).

[L2]

Harmonicity is preserved under holomorphic changes of coordinate (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).

[L3]

A bounded-domain continuous harmonic extension of fixed boundary data is unique (The bounded plane Dirichlet problem has at most one continuous harmonic solution).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the source datum φFΩ has a unique continuous harmonic solution u on Ω. Define v=uF1 on Ω. Since F1 is holomorphic on Ω, [L2] makes v harmonic on Ω.

L1L2given
2.1

The homeomorphic extension of F to the closures shows that F1 extends continuously from Ω to Ω. Therefore v extends continuously to Ω, and for ξΩ one has [step 1.1, given] v(ξ)=u(F1(ξ))=(φF)(F1(ξ))=φ(ξ). This identifies the transported boundary values.

step 1.1given
3.1

Let w be any other continuous harmonic function on Ω with boundary data φ. Then wF is continuous on Ω, harmonic on Ω by [L2], and has boundary values φF on Ω. By [L3], one has wF=u on Ω, hence w=v on Ω.

L2L3step 2.1
4.1

Thus v=uF1 is exactly the unique Dirichlet solution on Ω with boundary data φ.

step 3.1

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources