How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subharmonic pieces glue across a boundary under the limsup inequality
Statement
Let be a complex domain, let be open, let be subharmonic on , and let be subharmonic on every connected component of . Assume that for every , Define Then is subharmonic on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain , an open subset , subharmonic functions on and on every component of , and the boundary limsup inequality of the Statement.
Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs (Subharmonicity is equivalent to harmonic comparison on compactly contained discs).
Finite maxima preserve subharmonicity (Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity).
A subharmonic function attaining a finite interior maximum on a connected domain is constant (A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component).
Proof
On , the function is subharmonic by [L2]. Away from its upper semicontinuity is therefore clear. At , the inside limsup is at most by the hypothesis and upper semicontinuity of , while the outside limsup is at most . Thus is upper semicontinuous on .
Let be a closed disc and let be continuous on , harmonic on , and satisfy on . Because there, [L1] first gives throughout .
Let be a connected component of . On one has . At a boundary point of inside , the seam hypothesis and step 1.2 give . Thus the subharmonic function has boundary limsup at most on the bounded domain . If it were positive somewhere, upper semicontinuity and the boundary bound would make it attain a positive interior maximum, contradicting [L3]. Hence on every such component.
Steps 1.2 and 2.1 give on and on , hence throughout . Every harmonic boundary majorant therefore majorizes , so [L1] and step 1.1 make subharmonic on .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Paul Bourdon, and Wade Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)