How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A point on a nonsingleton boundary component is regular
Statement
Let be a bounded complex domain and let . If the connected component of containing is not a singleton, then is regular for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded complex domain and a boundary point whose boundary component contains another point.
If the complementary component of containing contains a second point, then is regular (A boundary point whose complementary component contains another point is regular).
Proof
Let be the connected component of containing , and choose with . Because is connected, it lies in a single connected component of ; that component contains both and .
Step 1.1 puts under the hypothesis of [L1], so is regular for .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Boris Khoruzhenko, Potential Theory lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)