Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Low-frequency bound for the Weierstrass difference quotient

Statement

Use the parameters and probe points of Nearest-integer probe points for the Weierstrass function, and suppose ab>1. Put

Am:=∑n<man(cos⁡(bnπxm)−cos⁡(bnπx0)).

Then A0=0 and, for every m∈N,

∣Am∣≤π(xm−x0)(ab)m−1ab−1.

In particular, for every m≥1,

∣Am∣<π(ab)m(xm−x0)/(ab−1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Parameters 0<a<1, an odd integer b>1 with ab>1, a real x0, and the associated probes xm.

[L1]

∣cos⁡u−cos⁡v∣≤∣u−v∣ for all real u,v (Sine and cosine are 1-Lipschitz on R).

[L2]

The probes satisfy 0<xm−x0≤3/(2bm) (Nearest-integer probe points for the Weierstrass function).

[L3]

Finite sums satisfy ∑n<0cn=0 and ∑n<m+1cn=∑n<mcn+cm (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion).

[L4]

Finite sums preserve termwise inequalities and commute with scalar multiplication (Laws of finite sums and finite products, claims 2 and 4).

[L5]

For reals x,y, ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣ (The triangle inequality).

[L6]

The number π=2γ is positive because the smallest positive zero of cosine satisfies γ∈(0,2) (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL2L3construct

The displayed finite sum defines Am, and [L3] gives A0=0.

1.2givenL3algebra

Multiplying the finite sum ∑n<m(ab)n by ab−1 and telescoping gives (ab−1)∑n<m(ab)n=(ab)m−1, including at m=0; since ab−1>0, ∑n<m(ab)n=(ab)m−1ab−1.

2.1step 1.1L1L2L4L5L6algebra

Repeated use of [L5], followed by [L1] on each summand and [L4], gives ∣Am∣≤∑n<manbnπ∣xm−x0∣=π(xm−x0)∑n<m(ab)n, where [L2] supplies xm−x0>0 and [L6] supplies π>0.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

Substitute step 1.2 into step 2.1. For m≥1, one has (ab)m−1<(ab)m and the other factors are positive, so the strict displayed bound follows; at m=0, the non-strict formula already gives A0=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources