Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zeta three four one logarithmic derivative inequality

Statement

For σ>1 and t∈R, −3ζ′(σ)ζ(σ)−4Re⁡ζ′(σ+it)ζ(σ+it)−Re⁡ζ′(σ+2it)ζ(σ+2it)≥0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

The logarithmic derivative of the zeta Dirichlet series is the Dirichlet series of the von Mangoldt function on Re s greater than 1: For ℜs>1, if ζ(s):=∑n≥1n−s, then −ζ′(s)ζ(s)=∑n≥1Λ(n)n−s.

Proof

1.1F1

The negative logarithmic derivative has coefficients Λ(n)≥0. Its series is absolutely convergent for σ>1 (also Λ(n)≤log⁡n), so the displayed expression equals ∑n≥1Λ(n)n−σ[3+4cos⁡(tlog⁡n)+cos⁡(2tlog⁡n)].

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

For real u, 3+4cos⁡u+cos⁡(2u)=2(1+cos⁡u)2≥0. Every summand is nonnegative, so the convergent sum is nonnegative.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources