How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cayley-graph neighbourhoods are equipotent, and local finiteness is equivalent to finiteness of the symmetrised subset
Statement
Let be a group, , and . Left translation gives a bijection between the neighbourhoods of any two vertices of . The graph is locally finite exactly when is finite; in that case it is regular of finite degree .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , a subset , and .
The Cayley graph of a group with respect to a subset has vertex set and edge set (The Cayley graph of a group with respect to a subset).
A graph is locally finite when every vertex has finitely many neighbours (Locally finite graphs and vertex degree without a finiteness hypothesis).
The degree of is , equivalently the number of edges incident with . A graph is -regular when every vertex has degree ; it is cubic when it is -regular. (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).
A set is finite when for some . (The cardinality of a finite set).
Proof
The neighbours of are the elements with in the symmetrised set minus the identity, and left multiplication by is a bijection from the neighbours of to those of .
Thus one neighbourhood is finite exactly when all are, which occurs exactly when is finite. In that case the degree is defined at every vertex and equals , so the graph is regular of that finite degree.
Depends on
Used by
- The Cayley graph of the free group on two generators is the tree in which every vertex has four neighbours Example
- The dihedral group of order eight has Cayley graphs that are a cycle of length eight and a cube Example
- FALSE: the Cayley graph of a group is independent of the chosen generating set False statement
- Balls of a word metric are finite if and only if the generating set is finite Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. Loh, Geometric Group Theory: An Introduction (2015 course version), 264 pp. (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. Drutu and M. Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory (with an appendix by B. Nica), 837 pp. (standard reference, not scraped)