How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A diffeomorphism pulls back tensor fields and forms isomorphically
Statement
If is a diffeomorphism, then pullback by is an isomorphism on covariant tensor fields and on differential forms. Its inverse is pullback by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A diffeomorphism with inverse .
A diffeomorphism has a smooth inverse (Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).
Covariant tensor pullback and form pullback are functorial (Pullback of covariant tensors is smooth and functorial, Pullback of forms is smooth functorial and preserves wedges).
Proof
By [F1], both and are smooth, so [L1] gives pullback maps in both directions on covariant tensor fields and on forms.
Functoriality from [L1] yields The identity pullback is the identity map by the same functoriality statements.
Hence is an isomorphism with inverse on covariant tensor fields and on differential forms.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)