Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Both constant-step BDF2 test roots vanish in the stiff limit

Statement

For Re⁡z≤0, let ζ be any root of the constant-step BDF2 test polynomial Pz(ζ)=(3−2z)ζ2−4ζ+1. As ∣z∣→∞ within the closed left half-plane, every such root satisfies ζ→0.

This is a multistep damping statement. It does not extend the one-step definition of L-stability to multistep methods.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex number z with Re⁡z≤0 and a root ζ of the stated BDF2 test polynomial.

[F1]

BDF2 roots on or outside the unit disk map to the closed right half-plane: the BDF2 test polynomial on a uniform grid is (3−2z)ζ2−4ζ+1.

[F3]

Complex modulus restricts to real absolute value: the complex modulus of an embedded real number equals its real absolute value.

The reverse triangle inequality follows from [F2] and [F3]: ∣u∣≤∣u−v∣+∣v∣ and ∣v∣≤∣v−u∣+∣u∣, with ∣v−u∣=∣−1∣∣u−v∣=∣u−v∣.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Let C=∣3−2z∣ and r=∣ζ∣. By [F1], the root equation implies (3−2z)ζ2=4ζ−1, hence [F2] gives Cr2=∣4ζ−1∣≤4r+1. The reverse triangle inequality gives C≥∣∣3∣−∣2z∣∣=∣3−2∣z∣∣≥2∣z∣−3, using multiplicativity and [F3] for the real factors 2 and 3. Thus C→∞ as ∣z∣→∞.

2.1step 1.1choosealgebra∎

If C>5 and r≥1, step 1.1 gives Cr2≤4r+1≤5r, hence C≤5/r≤5, a contradiction. Thus r<1 for C>5, and then Cr2≤4r+1<5. Given ε>0, choose ∣z∣ large enough that C>max⁡{5,5/ε2}; step 1.1 ensures this is possible. Then r2<5/C<ε2, so r<ε. This estimate holds for every root, proving the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources