How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Characters of finite-dimensional modules are Weyl-invariant
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a finite-dimensional -module and let act on the finite-support elements of the completed character ring by as in The Weyl alternation operator. Then and equivalently the weight multiplicities of satisfy for all and , so that . In particular the formal character of every finite-dimensional simple module is -invariant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a finite-dimensional -module with finite weight-space decomposition, its formal character, the Weyl group acting on finite-support elements of , and elements , .
The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the published weight-multiplicity supplier of [F3] (The Axiom of Choice).
is a finite-support element of , the sum running over the finitely many weights of (The formal character of a finite-dimensional weight module).
On finite-support elements the action of is (The Weyl alternation operator).
Every weight multiplicity of is invariant under every simple reflection: for all (Simple reflections preserve weight multiplicities), and every is a product of simple reflections (Weyl length equals inversion number).
Proof
By [F1] the character is the finite sum , so [F2] gives for every .
Reindexing the finite sum of step 1.1 by , so that , gives ; since is a product of simple reflections by [F3] and each simple reflection preserves the multiplicities by [F3], applying the invariance one reflection at a time yields for every .
Substituting into step 2.1 gives , which is the first assertion; comparing the coefficient of in the two displayed expressions for in steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives , that is, after replacing by , and then ; applying the result to a finite-dimensional simple module gives the final assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras II (MIT 18.755, Spring 2024), complete lectures (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Moreau, Representation Theory of Lie Algebras (M2, Université Paris-Saclay, 2025--2026) (standard reference, not scraped)