Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Characters of finite-dimensional modules are Weyl-invariant

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let V be a finite-dimensional g-module and let W act on the finite-support elements of the completed character ring R by w⋅eμ=ewμ as in The Weyl alternation operator. Then w⋅ch⁡V=ch⁡V(w∈W), and equivalently the weight multiplicities of V satisfy dim⁡Vwμ=dim⁡Vμ for all w∈W and μ∈h∗, so that ch⁡V=∑μ(dim⁡Vwμ)eμ. In particular the formal character of every finite-dimensional simple module is W-invariant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a finite-dimensional g-module V with finite weight-space decomposition, its formal character, the Weyl group W acting on finite-support elements of R, and elements w∈W, μ∈h∗.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the published weight-multiplicity supplier of [F3] (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

ch⁡V=∑μ(dim⁡Vμ)eμ is a finite-support element of R, the sum running over the finitely many weights of V (The formal character of a finite-dimensional weight module).

[F2]

On finite-support elements the action of w is w⋅∑μcμeμ=∑μcμewμ (The Weyl alternation operator).

[F3]

Every weight multiplicity of V is invariant under every simple reflection: dim⁡Vsiμ=dim⁡Vμ for all μ (Simple reflections preserve weight multiplicities), and every w∈W is a product of simple reflections (Weyl length equals inversion number).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebraA1

By [F1] the character is the finite sum ch⁡V=∑μ(dim⁡Vμ)eμ, so [F2] gives w⋅ch⁡V=∑μ(dim⁡Vμ)ewμ for every w∈W.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Reindexing the finite sum of step 1.1 by ν=wμ, so that μ=w−1ν, gives w⋅ch⁡V=∑ν(dim⁡Vw−1ν)eν; since w−1 is a product of simple reflections by [F3] and each simple reflection preserves the multiplicities by [F3], applying the invariance one reflection at a time yields dim⁡Vw−1ν=dim⁡Vν for every ν∈h∗.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Substituting into step 2.1 gives w⋅ch⁡V=∑ν(dim⁡Vν)eν=ch⁡V, which is the first assertion; comparing the coefficient of eν in the two displayed expressions for w⋅ch⁡V in steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives dim⁡Vν=dim⁡Vw−1ν, that is, dim⁡Vwμ=dim⁡Vμ after replacing w by w−1, and then ch⁡V=∑μ(dim⁡Vwμ)eμ; applying the result to a finite-dimensional simple module V=L(λ) gives the final assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources