Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Split Cartan subalgebras of classical matrix Lie algebras

Statement

Let g be one of sln(C), sp2n(C), so2n(C), so2n+1(C) (Classical complex matrix Lie algebras). Then the matrices whose a-part is a diagonal matrix diag(x1,,xn) (in the sln case, with ixi=0) and whose remaining blocks vanish form a Cartan subalgebra h (Cartan subalgebra); it is abelian and hCn1 for sln while hCn for each symplectic or orthogonal algebra; it is maximal toral and equals its own centralizer in g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: One of the matrix Lie algebras above, its diagonal subalgebra h, and the matrix units Eab.

[L1]

The algebras are the sets described in Classical complex matrix Lie algebras, with the block forms A=(abcaT) (a diagonal in h, b=c=0) and the analogous odd orthogonal form. In all cases [H,Eab]=(HaaHbb)Eab when H is diagonal.

[L2]

A Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent Lie subalgebra equal to its own normalizer; the normalizer and torality conventions are those of Cartan subalgebra, Normalizer of a Lie subalgebra and Toral and maximal toral subalgebras.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

h is abelian, hence nilpotent, and the linear map sending a diagonal matrix to its diagonal vector is an isomorphism of h with the sum-zero hyperplane of Cn (respectively with Cn in the non-special-linear cases); the relevant dimensions are n1 for sln and n otherwise.

L1L2algebra
1.2

Choose H0h whose full ambient diagonal entries are pairwise distinct: in sln take hi=i(n+1)/2; in the even symplectic and orthogonal cases take the diagonal entries 1,,n,1,,n; and in the odd orthogonal case insert 0 before those 2n entries. If XNg(h), then [X,H0]h is diagonal. On the other hand every diagonal entry of a commutator with a diagonal matrix is zero, so [X,H0]=0. Its (a,b) entry is (H0,bbH0,aa)Xab; distinctness therefore makes every off-diagonal entry of X vanish. Intersecting the ambient diagonal matrices with the defining trace or form-preservation equations in [L1] gives exactly h. Thus Ng(h)=h, and consequently Cg(h)=h as well.

L1L2algebra
2.1

The adjoint action of h on the ambient matrix algebra is simultaneously diagonalizable: the matrix units Eab are common eigenvectors with eigenvalue HaaHbb by [L1]. Since g is invariant under every adH, their restrictions to g are simultaneously diagonalizable, so h is toral. Any toral subalgebra containing h is abelian and hence lies in Cg(h)=h by step 1.2; therefore h is maximal toral.

L1L2step 1.2algebra
3.1

By steps 1.1 and 1.2 the subalgebra h is nilpotent and equal to its normalizer, hence is a Cartan subalgebra; by step 2.1 it is maximal toral and equals its centralizer. This proves all the assertions.

L2step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources