How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Split Cartan subalgebras of classical matrix Lie algebras
Statement
Let be one of , , , (Classical complex matrix Lie algebras). Then the matrices whose -part is a diagonal matrix (in the case, with ) and whose remaining blocks vanish form a Cartan subalgebra (Cartan subalgebra); it is abelian and for while for each symplectic or orthogonal algebra; it is maximal toral and equals its own centralizer in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: One of the matrix Lie algebras above, its diagonal subalgebra , and the matrix units .
The algebras are the sets described in Classical complex matrix Lie algebras, with the block forms (a diagonal in , ) and the analogous odd orthogonal form. In all cases when is diagonal.
A Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent Lie subalgebra equal to its own normalizer; the normalizer and torality conventions are those of Cartan subalgebra, Normalizer of a Lie subalgebra and Toral and maximal toral subalgebras.
Proof
is abelian, hence nilpotent, and the linear map sending a diagonal matrix to its diagonal vector is an isomorphism of with the sum-zero hyperplane of (respectively with in the non-special-linear cases); the relevant dimensions are for and otherwise.
Choose whose full ambient diagonal entries are pairwise distinct: in take ; in the even symplectic and orthogonal cases take the diagonal entries ; and in the odd orthogonal case insert before those entries. If , then is diagonal. On the other hand every diagonal entry of a commutator with a diagonal matrix is zero, so . Its entry is ; distinctness therefore makes every off-diagonal entry of vanish. Intersecting the ambient diagonal matrices with the defining trace or form-preservation equations in [L1] gives exactly . Thus , and consequently as well.
The adjoint action of on the ambient matrix algebra is simultaneously diagonalizable: the matrix units are common eigenvectors with eigenvalue by [L1]. Since is invariant under every , their restrictions to are simultaneously diagonalizable, so is toral. Any toral subalgebra containing is abelian and hence lies in by step 1.2; therefore is maximal toral.
By steps 1.1 and 1.2 the subalgebra is nilpotent and equal to its normalizer, hence is a Cartan subalgebra; by step 2.1 it is maximal toral and equals its centralizer. This proves all the assertions.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I, Lectures 19-24 (standard reference, not scraped)