Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras

Statement

Let h be the diagonal Cartan subalgebra of one of sln(C), sp2n(C), so2n(C), so2n+1(C) (Split Cartan subalgebras of classical matrix Lie algebras), where n2 in the special-linear and even-orthogonal cases and n1 in the symplectic and odd-orthogonal cases, and let ε1,,εnh be the coordinate functionals, εi(H)=xi, where the a-block is diag(x1,,xn). Thus the full diagonal of H is (x1,,xn) in the special-linear case, (x1,,xn,x1,,xn) in the even cases, and (0,x1,,xn,x1,,xn) in the odd case. Here a root means a nonzero simultaneous adjoint weight: its root space is {X:[H,X]=α(H)X for every Hh}. Then the roots and root spaces are:

  1. sln(C): the roots εiεj, ij, with root spaces CEij;
  2. sp2n(C): the roots ±εi±εj, i<j, with difference-root spaces from the a-block and sum-root spaces from the symmetric b- and c-blocks, as specified below, and the roots ±2εi, with root spaces CEi,n+i and CEn+i,i;
  3. so2n(C): the roots ±εi±εj, i<j, with root spaces spanned by the corresponding block matrix units;
  4. so2n+1(C): the roots ±εi±εj, i<j, together with the roots ±εi, with root spaces spanned by the corresponding block matrix units.

In every case every root space is one-dimensional, and the listed root sets are reduced crystallographic Euclidean root systems in their real spans, of types An1, Cn, Dn, Bn respectively, with the low-rank identifications B1=C1=A1, C2=B2, D2=A1A1, and D3=A3.

Remarks

The low-rank identifications are checked directly in step 5.1. The later example collecting those coincidences is therefore explanatory rather than a logical prerequisite, which breaks the former circular dependency.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: One of the classical matrix Lie algebras g, its diagonal subalgebra h, the coordinate functionals εi, and the matrix units Eab.

[L1]

The algebras and their block decompositions are as in Classical complex matrix Lie algebras; for diagonal H and matrix units Eab one has [H,Eab]=(HaaHbb)Eab, and the off-diagonal block units satisfy the symmetry conditions b=bT (symplectic), b=bT (orthogonal), with the odd case adding the u and w blocks.

[L2]

The diagonal a-block with the other blocks zero gives a Cartan subalgebra; for sln its diagonal coordinates sum to zero (Split Cartan subalgebras of classical matrix Lie algebras, Cartan subalgebra). The simultaneous eigenbasis needed below is constructed explicitly, without a semisimplicity premise.

[L3]

A regular vector determines a positive system whose indecomposable positive roots form its base; the Cartan matrix and Dynkin diagram of a base are computed from the simple-root inner products, and the classified type names have their indicated diagrams (Positive systems and simple roots, Cartan matrix of a based root system, Dynkin diagram with edge multiplicity and arrow convention, Existence of each classified root system).

[L4]

A root system in the sense used here is a reduced crystallographic root system (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

In sln, take the off-diagonal units Eij and a basis of the trace-zero diagonal space. The former have weights εiεj and the latter weight zero, because [H,Eij]=(xixj)Eij. These form a basis. Distinct differences remain distinct on the sum-zero hyperplane: a difference of their coefficient vectors has coordinate sum zero, and if it vanishes on that hyperplane it is a constant vector, hence zero. No such difference weight is zero for n2.

L1L2algebra
1.2

For the even cases, write Aij for the full block matrix with a=Eij, b=c=0, hence lower diagonal block Eji. It has weight εiεj; Aii has weight zero. In the symplectic case let Bij and Cij have respectively only b=Eij+Eji or c=Eij+Eji nonzero, for i<j. Their weights are εi+εj and εiεj. Also allow b=Eii or c=Eii, with weights 2εi and 2εi. In the even orthogonal case replace the plus sign in the off-diagonal block units by minus and omit the diagonal b,c units. Each assertion follows entry by entry from [H,X]rs=(HrrHss)Xrs, since the paired entries have equal weights. These matrices are a basis by the independent a,b,c block parameters in [L1].

L1L2algebra
2.1

In the odd orthogonal case embed the even orthogonal basis of step 1.2 in the last 2n rows and columns. Add Wi with w=ei, u=0, and Ui with u=eiT, w=0, all a,b,c zero, with their forced negative-transpose entries as in [L1]. The two nonzero entries of Wi have weight xi and those of Ui weight xi, because the first full diagonal entry of H is zero. Together with the embedded even basis these form a basis of the odd algebra.

L1L2step 1.2algebra
3.1

The bases in steps 1.1–2.1 are simultaneous eigenbases. Their nonzero weights are exactly the lists in the statement and are pairwise distinct. For the non-special-linear cases this follows by comparing coefficient vectors in the independent xi coordinates; in the special-linear case it was checked in step 1.1. If a linear combination is an eigenvector of weight α, comparison of each basis coefficient for every H makes every nonzero coefficient have weight α. Thus each listed nonzero weight space is exactly its displayed line, and there are no other nonzero weight spaces. The zero weight space is precisely the diagonal Cartan. This also treats sp2 and so3, where the i<j lists are empty but the two single-coordinate root vectors remain.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra
4.1

Give the real weight span the standard Euclidean realization: for type A, identify the difference functionals with eiej in ti=0Rn; otherwise identify εi with the orthonormal ei in Rn. The lists are finite, omit zero and are reduced. They span: adjacent differences span the type A hyperplane, the coordinate roots span types B,C, and eiej,ei+ej span every coordinate direction in type D for n2. Reflection in eiej exchanges coordinates i,j; reflection in ei+ej exchanges and negates them; reflection in ei or 2ei negates coordinate i. Each operation preserves the appropriate list. For denominator roots of squared length two, the Cartan integer is the integer dot product. For denominator ei it is 2βi and for denominator 2ei it is βi, again integral. These computations verify every axiom of [L4], including the smallest allowed ranks. In particular, the squared norm four of a long type C root is included in the denominator calculation.

L4step 3.1algebra
5.1

The type labels can be verified from the displayed sets rather than imported from an existence interface. Choose positives eiej and ei+ej for i<j, together with ei in type B or 2ei in type C. The proposed bases are αi=eiei+1 for type A; the same αi for i<n followed by αn=en for Bn or αn=2en for Cn; and αi=eiei+1 for i<n followed by αn=en1+en for Dn. They are bases in the sense of [L3]: for example eiej=k=ij1αk; in type B, ei=k=inαk and ei+ej=k=ij1αk+2k=jnαk; in type C, 2ei=2k=in1αk+αn and ei+ej=k=ij1αk+2k=jn1αk+αn. In type D, the same difference formula holds, while ei+ej=k=ij1αk+2k=jn2αk+αn1+αn for j<n, and ei+en=k=in2αk+αn; hence every positive root has nonnegative integral coordinates and each height-one αi is indecomposable. All A and D simple roots have squared length two; their nonzero off-diagonal inner products are 1, giving the A chain and, for n4, the Dn fork at αn2. For Bn the last pair has Cartan entries an1,n=1, an,n1=2, while for Cn they are 2,1; all other adjacent pairs give 1,1. By [L3] these are exactly the stable-range diagrams An1,Bn,Cn,Dn, with the required double-edge directions, so no coordinate information is borrowed from [L3]'s supplier proof. For the small ranks, B1={±e1} and C1={±2e1} are A1 up to scale. The map e1e1+e2, e2e1e2 carries B2 to C2 and scales the inner product by two. The two orthogonal pairs ±(e1e2),±(e1+e2) give D2=A1A1. For D3, the orthogonal vectors u1=(1,1,1,1)/2, u2=(1,1,1,1)/2, u3=(1,1,1,1)/2 form an orthonormal basis of the sum-zero hyperplane in R4. The isometry eiui maps its twelve roots ±ei±ej onto the twelve differences of coordinate vectors in R4, which are A3. Thus all stable and low-rank type identifications follow from explicit Cartan matrices and maps.

L3step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources