Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical root systems in coordinates

Example

For n2, in the standard coordinates ε1,,εn of Rn (and the sum-zero hyperplane for type A): An1={εiεj:ij},Bn={±εi}{±εi±εj:i<j}, Cn={±2εi}{±εi±εj:i<j},Dn={±εi±εj:i<j}. Each is a reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system with the standard simple roots and Dynkin diagram, and each is the root system computed from the corresponding classical matrix Lie algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n2, the standard orthonormal basis ε1,,εn of Rn, and the four displayed sets.

[L1]

A reduced crystallographic root system is a finite spanning set of nonzero vectors that is closed under its root reflections, has integral Cartan integers, and meets each root line in exactly the two signs (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system).

[L2]

The root systems of the classical matrix Lie algebras with diagonal Cartan subalgebras are these same sets, with one-dimensional root spaces (Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras).

[L3]

In the cited coordinate models, the standard simple roots are εiεi+1 for An1; ε1ε2,,εn1εn,εn for Bn; ε1ε2,,εn1εn,2εn for Cn; and, for Dn with n3, ε1ε2,,εn2εn1,εn1εn,εn1+εn. For D2 the two simple roots are ε1ε2 and ε1+ε2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Each set is finite, omits 0, and is reduced. The differences εiεn span the sum-zero hyperplane for An1; Bn and Cn contain a nonzero multiple of every coordinate vector; and in Dn, (εi+εj)+(εiεj)=2εi for any ji, which exists because n2. Thus each set spans its stated Euclidean space.

L1algebra
1.2

Reflection closure: sεi and s2εi negate the ith coordinate and preserve Bn,Cn,Dn; sεiεj swaps coordinates i,j and preserves all four sets; and sεi+εj swaps and negates those two coordinates and preserves Bn,Cn,Dn. These are precisely the root reflections that occur in the displayed sets.

L1algebra
2.1

Integrality: proportional pairs give Cartan integer ±2. For nonproportional pairs, roots of squared length 2 pair by 0 or ±1; a short root of squared length 1 in Bn pairs by 0 or ±1; and a long root 2εi of squared length 4 in Cn pairs with a mixed root by 0 or ±2. Hence every Cartan integer is in {0,±1,±2}. Together with steps 1.1 and 1.2, [L1] proves that all four displayed sets are reduced crystallographic root systems.

L1step 1.1step 1.2algebra
3.1

The listed simple roots of [L3] have the standard Cartan matrices of An1,Bn,Cn,Dn (with D2=A1A1), giving the stated Dynkin diagrams; and [L2] identifies these coordinate sets as the root systems of sln,so2n+1,sp2n,so2n respectively.

L2L3step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources