How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical root systems in coordinates
Example
For , in the standard coordinates of (and the sum-zero hyperplane for type ): Each is a reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system with the standard simple roots and Dynkin diagram, and each is the root system computed from the corresponding classical matrix Lie algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the standard orthonormal basis of , and the four displayed sets.
A reduced crystallographic root system is a finite spanning set of nonzero vectors that is closed under its root reflections, has integral Cartan integers, and meets each root line in exactly the two signs (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system).
The root systems of the classical matrix Lie algebras with diagonal Cartan subalgebras are these same sets, with one-dimensional root spaces (Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras).
In the cited coordinate models, the standard simple roots are for ; for ; for ; and, for with , . For the two simple roots are and .
Verification
Each set is finite, omits , and is reduced. The differences span the sum-zero hyperplane for ; and contain a nonzero multiple of every coordinate vector; and in , for any , which exists because . Thus each set spans its stated Euclidean space.
Reflection closure: and negate the th coordinate and preserve ; swaps coordinates and preserves all four sets; and swaps and negates those two coordinates and preserves . These are precisely the root reflections that occur in the displayed sets.
Integrality: proportional pairs give Cartan integer . For nonproportional pairs, roots of squared length pair by or ; a short root of squared length in pairs by or ; and a long root of squared length in pairs with a mixed root by or . Hence every Cartan integer is in . Together with steps 1.1 and 1.2, [L1] proves that all four displayed sets are reduced crystallographic root systems.
The listed simple roots of [L3] have the standard Cartan matrices of (with ), giving the stated Dynkin diagrams; and [L2] identifies these coordinate sets as the root systems of respectively.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed., Chapter II (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I, Lectures 19-24 (standard reference, not scraped)