How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dynkin duality of and
Example
For , the and diagrams have the same underlying chain and opposite arrows on the unique double edge; transposing the Cartan matrix exchanges them.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer ; the simple roots of : ; and of : .
The Cartan matrix entry is , and the diagram has edges with the arrow toward the shorter root (Cartan matrix of a based root system, Dynkin diagram with edge multiplicity and arrow convention).
Coroot duality transposes the Cartan matrix, and the dual system of is (Duality exchanges B and C).
Verification
For : for and ; , so and ; all other off-diagonal entries of adjacent pairs are and the rest vanish. Thus the diagram is a chain with a double edge at the end, the arrow being governed by and pointing toward the shorter root .
For : for and ; , so and ; the diagram is again a chain with a double edge exactly at the end, and the arrow now points toward the shorter root .
The matrices of steps 1.1 and 1.2 are transposes of one another, which is exactly coroot duality by [L2]; so transposing the Cartan matrix exchanges and , reversing the arrow while keeping the chain and the double-edge position.
Remarks
The paired diagrams below display the chain for ; the dots abbreviate only single edges and their intervening vertices. For , replace the dotted portion by the single edge joining vertices and . For , retain only the terminal pair of vertices, numbered and . In that rank, the two diagrams are isomorphic after interchanging the vertices, although the displayed fixed numbering still reverses the arrow.
In the row-coroot convention of [L1], the ordered terminal entries are for and for . Thus the double-edge multiplicity is in both rows, while each arrow points to the shorter root. These are exactly the calculations in steps 1.1–2.1; the verification does not depend on the illustration.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I, Lectures 19-24 (standard reference, not scraped)