Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a finite-dimensional space, λ is an eigenvalue of T if and only if T−λI is not invertible

Statement

Let T:V→V be an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space over F, and let λ∈F. Then λ is an eigenvalue of T if and only if T−λIV is not invertible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional F-vector space V, an endomorphism T of V, and λ∈F.

[L1]

The scalar λ is an eigenvalue of T exactly when ker⁡(T−λIV)≠{0V} (Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism).

[L3]

For a linear map S:V→V with V finite-dimensional, dim⁡V=dim⁡ker⁡S+dim⁡im⁡S (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T). A subspace of V has dimension dim⁡V if and only if it is all of V (If dim⁡FV=n and U is a linear subspace of V, then U is finite-dimensional, dim⁡FU≤n, and dim⁡FU=n if and only if U=V, clause 2).

[L4]

An invertible linear map has a two-sided linear inverse, and hence is bijective (Invertible linear maps, linear isomorphisms, and inverse linear maps).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If λ is an eigenvalue, [L1] and [L2] show that T−λIV is not injective; it therefore cannot be invertible by [L4].

L1L2L4given
1.2

Conversely, suppose λ is not an eigenvalue. Then [L1] and [L2] make S=T−λIV injective, so ker⁡S={0}. By [L3], dim⁡im⁡S=dim⁡V, hence im⁡S=V and S is bijective. Its inverse function is linear: applying S to S−1(au+bv) and to aS−1(u)+bS−1(v) gives au+bv in both cases, and injectivity makes the two inputs equal. Thus S is invertible; contraposition gives that noninvertibility forces λ to be an eigenvalue.

L1L2L3L4givenalgebra
2.1

The two implications establish the equivalence. If V={0V}, [L1] makes the left side false and the unique endomorphism is the identity, so the same argument includes that case.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L4∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources