How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary high low identities
Statement
For the NP high/low classes, , , and consists exactly of NP languages polynomial-time Turing complete for NP. Both and hold for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
For a language and an integer , define The relativized levels and use the stated convention; SAT denotes satisfiability of general Boolean formulas, the first-level complete language supplied in the stated convention. At the highness benchmark is ; no identification of that class with is assumed. At positive levels the oracle characterization identifies with . More generally, lowness for a specified oracle machine class means . Highness here concerns polynomial-time oracle access, not many-one completeness or computability-theoretic jumps. (Lowness and highness).
and . (Np and conp are the first levels).
For fixed and , every nondeterministic polynomial-time -oracle computation has a definition. More generally, for a fixed total base oracle and , polynomial nondeterministic access to both and has a definition. (Ph adaptive oracle transcript normal form).
Proof
If , one query decides , so . Conversely a P decider for replaces each of polynomially many polynomial-length queries, giving . This proves the level-zero low identity under the restriction .
If , deterministic queries decide both and its complement in , so . Conversely assume both have NP verifiers. Guess an accepting branch and its adaptive query transcript, and an appropriate NP witness for every YES or NO answer. Deterministic replay and verification accepts exactly the real accepting transcripts; the total certificate length is polynomial. Therefore , while ignoring the oracle gives the reverse containment. The first-level identity identifies this with lowness at level one.
Every has a polynomial-time many-one reduction to SAT, so . Equality implies , which implies every NP language belongs to by composing its SAT reduction. Conversely that Turing completeness gives and allows every SAT query to be simulated using , proving . These reductions use the first-level complete language in the highness convention.
For , the relative oracle characterization gives : the base oracle may be absorbed into the inner language by a tagged union, since and that class is closed under tagged unions. For the same identity holds as , by replacing each subroutine with its deterministic oracle simulation. Thus equality of the inner classes, either with the unrelativized class or with the SAT-relativized class, propagates one level. This proves both nestings, including the zero-to-one transition. Empty transcripts and constant oracles are included by these simulations.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard Chang, On the Structure of Bounded Queries to Arbitrary NP Sets; §3 properties6–8 and preceding nesting statement, pp3–4. (standard reference, not scraped)