Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary high low identities

Statement

For the NP high/low classes, Low0=P, Low1=NPcoNP, and High0 consists exactly of NP languages polynomial-time Turing complete for NP. Both LowkLowk+1 and HighkHighk+1 hold for every k0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

For a language ANP and an integer k0, define Lowk={ANP:Σkp,A=Σkp},Highk={ANP:Σkp,A=Σkp,SAT}. The relativized levels and Σ0p,A=PA use the stated convention; SAT denotes satisfiability of general Boolean formulas, the first-level complete language supplied in the stated convention. At k=0 the highness benchmark is PSAT; no identification of that class with NP is assumed. At positive levels the oracle characterization identifies Σkp,SAT with Σk+1p. More generally, lowness for a specified oracle machine class C means CA=C. Highness here concerns polynomial-time oracle access, not many-one completeness or computability-theoretic jumps. (Lowness and highness).

[F2]

Σ1p=NP and Π1p=coNP. (Np and conp are the first levels).

[F3]

For fixed k1 and BΣkp, every nondeterministic polynomial-time B-oracle computation has a Σk+1p definition. More generally, for a fixed total base oracle A and BΣkp,A, polynomial nondeterministic access to both A and B has a Σk+1p,A definition. (Ph adaptive oracle transcript normal form).

Proof

1.1

If PA=P, one query decides A, so AP. Conversely a P decider for A replaces each of polynomially many polynomial-length queries, giving PA=P. This proves the level-zero low identity under the restriction ANP.

F1
1.2

If NPA=NP, deterministic queries decide both A and its complement in NPA, so ANPcoNP. Conversely assume both have NP verifiers. Guess an accepting branch and its adaptive query transcript, and an appropriate NP witness for every YES or NO answer. Deterministic replay and verification accepts exactly the real accepting transcripts; the total certificate length is polynomial. Therefore NPANP, while ignoring the oracle gives the reverse containment. The first-level identity identifies this with lowness at level one.

F2F3
1.3

Every ANP has a polynomial-time many-one reduction to SAT, so PAPSAT. Equality implies SATPA, which implies every NP language belongs to PA by composing its SAT reduction. Conversely that Turing completeness gives SATPA and allows every SAT query to be simulated using A, proving PSATPA. These reductions use the first-level complete language in the highness convention.

F1
2.1

For k1, the relative oracle characterization gives Σk+1p,A=NPΣkp,A: the base oracle may be absorbed into the inner language by a tagged union, since APAΣkp,A and that class is closed under tagged unions. For k=0 the same identity holds as NPPA=NPA, by replacing each PA subroutine with its deterministic oracle simulation. Thus equality of the inner classes, either with the unrelativized class or with the SAT-relativized class, propagates one level. This proves both nestings, including the zero-to-one transition. Empty transcripts and constant oracles are included by these simulations.

F1F3step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources