How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Erdős–Hajnal property and each of its constants pass to hereditary subclasses
Statement
If are hereditary graph classes, then every Erdős–Hajnal constant for is one for . In particular, the Erdős–Hajnal property passes from to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Hereditary graph classes and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for .
The constant condition says that every nonempty in the class satisfies (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).
Proof
Every nonempty also lies in , so [L1] gives .
Thus is a constant for ; the existence assertion follows by retaining any constant of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 9 results over 4 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Erdos-Hajnal properties in graphs and hypergraphs, introduction (standard reference, not scraped)