How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Isomorphic chain maps have isomorphic cones
Statement
Suppose is a strictly commuting square of chain maps with vertical chain isomorphisms. Then and are isomorphic as chain complexes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commuting square as displayed in the statement.
The cone differential is (The mapping cone of a chain map).
A chain map commutes with differentials (Chain map).
Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps (Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps).
Proof
Define by Using the commutative square together with [L1] and [L2], one gets so is a chain map.
Because and are chain isomorphisms, their inverses are again chain maps by [L3], and the same block-diagonal formula with and defines the inverse chain map to . Hence is a chain isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 13.9: Cones and termwise split sequences (standard reference, not scraped)