Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Lagrangian neighborhood germ is not uniquely determined

Statement

The data in the Weinstein Lagrangian neighborhood theorem do not uniquely determine its symplectomorphism germ, even when that germ is required to fix the Lagrangian pointwise. This already occurs for the zero section of TR with its canonical symplectic form.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cotangent model TR with its zero section.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Already on TR=R2 with coordinates (q,p), the map F(q,p)=(q+p,p) is a nonidentity diffeomorphism germ along the zero section. It fixes every (q,0) and satisfies F(dqdp)=d(q+p)dp=dqdp.

givenalgebra
2.1

For this cotangent model, the identity map is one symplectomorphism germ fixing the zero section, and the shear F from step 1.1 is another. They are distinct and have the same restriction to every point of that section. Hence these data do not uniquely determine a germ. The explicit pair requires no existence theorem or choice principle and makes no separate claim that a natural distinguished choice is impossible.

step 1.1construct

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources