Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weinstein Lagrangian neighborhood theorem

Statement

Assume ACω. If i:L↪(M,ω) is a closed Lagrangian embedding, then there are neighbourhoods U of i(L) in M and V of the zero section in (T∗L,−dλ) and a symplectomorphism Φ:V→U satisfying Φ(0x)=i(x) for every x∈L.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω and the closed Lagrangian embedding in the statement.

[F1]

Under the assumed choice principle, (M,ω) admits a compatible almost-complex structure. Every symplectic manifold admits a compatible almost-complex structure.

[F2]

The cotangent zero section with −dλ is the canonical model. Canonical symplectic model near the zero section of T∗L.

[F3]

Closed embeddings have tubular neighbourhoods, and relative Moser corrects two forms agreeing as tensors along the submanifold. The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold, Relative Moser theorem.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

Choose a compatible J by [F1]. Then J(TL) is a Lagrangian complement to TL: it is Lagrangian because J preserves ω, and if Ju∈TL then 0=ω(u,Ju)=gJ(u,u) forces u=0. The map J(TL)→T∗L, w↦αw with αw(u)=ω(u,w), is an isomorphism.

2.1F2F3step 1.1construct

At the zero section, T(T∗L)=TL⊕T∗L and ωcan((u,α),(v,β))=β(u)−α(v). Hence step 1.1 gives a symplectic bundle isomorphism TM∣L→T(T∗L)∣L equal to the identity on TL. Use tubular neighbourhoods from [F3] to realize it as the differential of a diffeomorphism h between neighbourhoods, fixed on L.

3.1F3step 2.1∎

The forms h∗ω and ωcan agree as tensors along the zero section. Their convex interpolation is symplectic after shrinking, so relative Moser in [F3] gives a correction fixed on the zero section. Composing it with h yields Φ and proves the claim, including noncompact closed L through variable-radius neighbourhoods.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources