How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The convolution detects perfect squares
Statement
For every positive integer ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive integer .
Proof
Write by For and any injective list of primes containing every prime divisor of , one has ; the exponents are determined by , and for every prime outside the list. Every positive divisor of has the form with , so Dirichlet convolution of arithmetic functions and Liouville's function give , where the factorization of the finite sum uses Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule.
For each , the alternating sum equals when is even and when is odd. Therefore the product in step 1.1 is exactly when every exponent is even, and otherwise it is .
By canonical factorization, every exponent is even exactly when is a perfect square. So step 2.1 is precisely the claimed square-indicator formula.
Depends on
- Dirichlet convolution of arithmetic functions
- The Dirichlet-convolution identity and the constant-one function
- Liouville's function
- Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule
- For $n \ge 1$ and any injective list $p : r \to \mathbb{Z}$ of primes containing every prime divisor of $n$, one has $n = \prod_{i<r} p_i^{\,v_{p_i}(n)}$; the exponents are determined by $n$, and $v_q(n) = 0$ for every prime $q$ outside the list
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Sanders, Topics in Analytic Number Theory, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victor Shoup, A Computational Introduction to Number Theory and Algebra, Section 2.9 (standard reference, not scraped)