How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every conjugacy class of an extraspecial -group outside the centre has exactly elements
Statement
Every conjugacy class of an extraspecial -group whose representative is not central has exactly elements. That is, for an extraspecial -group and ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An extraspecial -group (Special and extraspecial -groups) and an element with .
For the commutator is (Commutators and the commutator subgroup ).
For and , the right coset is (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup).
An extraspecial -group has derived subgroup of order (An extraspecial -group is nilpotent of class exactly two and its derived subgroup has order ).
for a finite group ( is a bijection, so whenever these cardinalities are finite).
For a finite group and , (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
, the number of left cosets of in (The coset set and the index of a subgroup).
A finite -group is a finite group whose order has the form for some (A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
Proof
For every one has , so each conjugate of has the form .
The derived subgroup of is and has order , and is a finite -group, so for some .
The size of the class of is the index , and by Lagrange that index divides .
Each lies in , so every conjugate of lies in the right coset ; the map is a bijection from onto that coset, so the coset has elements and the class of has at most .
Since , some fails to commute with , so , its index is greater than one, and the class of has more than one element.
The class size divides , so it is a power of ; it lies strictly between and inclusive, and the only such power of is itself.
Remarks
The hypothesis is used only at step 2.2, and it is used to rule out the class of size one. A central runs through the same computation and comes out with the class , which is consistent with step 2.1 and shows that the two cases exhaust the group.
Depends on
- An extraspecial $p$-group is nilpotent of class exactly two and its derived subgroup has order $p$
- The conjugacy class $\operatorname{Cl}_G(x)$ and centralizer $C_G(x)$ of an element
- $G/C_G(x)\to\operatorname{Cl}_G(x)$ is a bijection, so $|\operatorname{Cl}_G(x)|=[G:C_G(x)]$ whenever these cardinalities are finite
- The coset set $G/H$ and the index $[G:H]$ of a subgroup
- Lagrange's theorem: $|G|=[G:H]|H|$ for every subgroup $H$ of a finite group $G$
- The center $Z(G)$ of a group
- Left and right cosets $gH$ and $Hg$ of a subgroup
- A finite $p$-group has order $p^n$ for a prime $p$ and some $n\in\mathbb N$
- Commutators $[g,h]=ghg^{-1}h^{-1}$ and the commutator subgroup $[G,G]$
- Special and extraspecial $p$-groups
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. van Beek, Topics in Finite p-Groups, Proposition 2.41(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. A. Craven, The Theory of p-Groups, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)