Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The centre of an extraspecial p-group has no complement

Statement

Let P be an extraspecial p-group. Then Z(P) has no complement in P: there is no subgroup HP with P=Z(P)H and Z(P)H=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An extraspecial p-group P (Special and extraspecial p-groups).

[F1]

For subgroups N,H of G with NG, G=NH and NH={1}, the group G is the internal semidirect product of N by H, and H is called a complement to N in G (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup).

[F2]

Z(G):={zG:zg=gz for every gG} (The center Z(G) of a group).

[L1]

For a finite p-group P the following are equivalent: P is extraspecial; P is nonabelian, Z(P)=p and P/Z(P) is elementary abelian; P is nonabelian and Z(P)=P=Φ(P) has order p (Three equivalent descriptions of an extraspecial p-group).

[L2]

For every homomorphism f:GH, the rule gkerff(g) is an isomorphism from G/kerf onto imf (First isomorphism theorem for groups: G/kerfimf).

[L3]

An elementary abelian p-group is a finite abelian p-group in which every nonidentity element has order p (Elementary abelian p-groups).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose HP is a complement to Z(P), so that P=Z(P)H and Z(P)H=1; the centre is normal, so the quotient P/Z(P) is defined.

F1L1assume-contra
2.1

Let π:PP/Z(P) be the quotient map and restrict it to H. Its kernel is HZ(P)=1, and its image is all of P/Z(P) because every gP is zh with zZ(P) and hH, whence π(g)=π(h); so HP/Z(P).

L2step 1.1
3.1

The quotient P/Z(P) is elementary abelian, hence abelian, so H is abelian.

L1L3step 2.1
4.1

Every element of P is zh with z central and hH, and (z1h1)(z2h2)=z1z2h1h2=z2z1h2h1=(z2h2)(z1h1), so P is abelian; this contradicts the nonabelianness of an extraspecial group.

F2step 1.1step 3.1discharge-contradiction

Remarks

The argument uses no bound on the order of P, so the conclusion holds for every extraspecial group and not only for those of order p3. What fails is not that a complement is hard to find but that its existence would make the group abelian, which the definition forbids.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources