How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The centre of an extraspecial -group has no complement
Statement
Let be an extraspecial -group. Then has no complement in : there is no subgroup with and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An extraspecial -group (Special and extraspecial -groups).
For subgroups of with , and , the group is the internal semidirect product of by , and is called a complement to in (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup).
For a finite -group the following are equivalent: is extraspecial; is nonabelian, and is elementary abelian; is nonabelian and has order (Three equivalent descriptions of an extraspecial -group).
For every homomorphism , the rule is an isomorphism from onto (First isomorphism theorem for groups: ).
An elementary abelian -group is a finite abelian -group in which every nonidentity element has order (Elementary abelian -groups).
Proof
Suppose is a complement to , so that and ; the centre is normal, so the quotient is defined.
Let be the quotient map and restrict it to . Its kernel is , and its image is all of because every is with and , whence ; so .
The quotient is elementary abelian, hence abelian, so is abelian.
Every element of is with central and , and , so is abelian; this contradicts the nonabelianness of an extraspecial group.
Remarks
The argument uses no bound on the order of , so the conclusion holds for every extraspecial group and not only for those of order . What fails is not that a complement is hard to find but that its existence would make the group abelian, which the definition forbids.
Depends on
- Three equivalent descriptions of an extraspecial $p$-group
- An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup
- Elementary abelian $p$-groups
- First isomorphism theorem for groups: $G/\ker f\cong\operatorname{im}f$
- The quotient group $G/N$ and coset product $(gN)(hN)=ghN$
- The center $Z(G)$ of a group
- Special and extraspecial $p$-groups
Used by
- FALSE: the centre of an extraspecial p-group has a complement False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. van Beek, Topics in Finite p-Groups, Proposition 2.32(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)