Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Opposite root spaces bracket to the Killing-dual line

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let g be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra, let h be a Cartan subalgebra, let α be a root, and let x∈gα, y∈g−α. Then

[x,y]=B(x,y)Hα,

where Hα is the vector from The Killing-dual vector attached to a root. In particular, [gα,g−α] is the line CHα.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, a root α, vectors x∈gα, y∈g−α, and the Killing-dual vector Hα.

[L0]

Under Choice, Root-space decomposition relative to a Cartan subalgebra identifies the supplied Cartan subalgebra as maximal toral and provides its finite root-space decomposition.

[L1]

For this maximal-toral subalgebra, Finite semisimple Cartan, root and string structure proves that the Killing pairing between opposite root spaces is perfect, the Cartan restriction is nondegenerate, and α is nonzero.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L0givenalgebra

By [L0] and Brackets of root spaces add their roots, the bracket [x,y] lies in g0=h. For every h∈h, invariance of the Killing form gives B([x,y],h)=B(x,[y,h])=α(h)B(x,y)=B(x,y)B(Hα,h).

2.1step 1.1

Because both [x,y] and B(x,y)Hα lie in h and have the same Killing pairings with every h∈h, nondegeneracy of the restriction from Under Choice, the Killing form pairs only opposite root spaces forces [x,y]=B(x,y)Hα.

3.1L1step 2.1∎

The root space gα is nonzero by the definition of a root. Choose 0≠x∈gα; the perfect opposite-root pairing in [L1] supplies y∈g−α with B(x,y)≠0. Also Hα≠0, for otherwise its defining equation would make the nonzero root α the zero functional. Thus step 2.1 gives a nonzero scalar multiple of Hα in the bracket image, while every bracket lies on that line. Hence [gα,g−α]=CHα.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources