Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gate and reflection accounting for randomized known-count search

Statement

Each uniform-state preparation uses exactly n Hadamard gates. Write R0=2∣0n⟩⟨0n∣−I and let C(R0) be its declared gate cost if implemented or supplied as a named reflection. Conjugation gives Rs=H⊗nR0H⊗n, so an iterate uses 2n Hadamards, cost C(R0), and one bit-oracle query. For the 0<t≤N/2 branch, the total nonoracle gate cost is at most 9[n+2+(K−1)(2n+C(R0))],K=⌈N/t⌉, up to measurement and output handling. For t>N/2 it is at most 9n Hadamards plus measurement/output handling. The reflection is not a free oracle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The nine-round known-count algorithm, the exact one-qubit gate alphabet, and the declared circuit resource model.

[F1]

Known-count search by randomized Grover iteration: each accepted randomized round prepares a fresh uniform state, uses at most K−1 iterates when t≤N/2, and the direct branch uses only uniform preparation before verification.

[F2]

Exact one-qubit gates and rotations: H is the exact Hadamard matrix with H∣0⟩=(∣0⟩+∣1⟩)/2 and H2=I.

[F3]

Orthogonal-Projector Reflection and Access Contract: a prepared-state reflection is UR0U†, and its cost includes the preparation, reflection, and inverse preparation unless a different declared primitive is supplied.

[F4]

Projector Reflections Are Hermitian Unitary Involutions: both reflection signs are unitary involutions with the declared signs.

[F5]

Finite circuit resource accounting: gate occurrences, queries, and classical bit operations are separate resource coordinates.

[F6]

Circuit-family and computation cost model: a cost record keeps gate and query coordinates separate and assigns no zero cost to an unspecified oracle or controlled access.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F5

Applying H to each of the n address wires sends ∣0n⟩ to 2−n/2∑x∣x⟩=∣s⟩ by the tensor-product action, using exactly n occurrences of H by [F2] and [F5]. The n=0 case has no such occurrences.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4F6algebra

Since H⊗n∣0n⟩=∣s⟩ and (H⊗n)†=H⊗n, conjugating R0 gives H⊗nR0H⊗n=2∣s⟩⟨s∣−I=Rs. This costs 2n Hadamards plus the declared C(R0); [F3]–[F4] do not make the all-zero reflection free.

3.1givenF1step 1.1step 2.1F5F6algebra

In the t≤N/2 branch each round has at most one fresh preparation, two gates X,H for the response qubit, and at most K−1 iterates. Each iterate has the nonoracle cost in step 2.1; its query is excluded from this gate total by [F5]–[F6]. Multiplying the per-round bound by nine gives the stated upper bound, including rejected rounds as zero-cost cases.

4.1givenF1step 1.1F5F6∎

When t>N/2, each of at most nine direct rounds only prepares ∣s⟩ and measures/verifies, so there are at most 9n Hadamards and no diffusion reflection. The t=0 branch returns before preparation.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources