Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ricci decomposition of the Riemann tensor in dimension at least three

Statement

This item assumes ACω, namely countable choice. In the propagated dependency chain, that assumption is required through Kulkarni–Nomizu product, trace-free Ricci tensor, and Weyl curvature, Algebraic symmetries of the Riemann tensor, Ricci curvature is symmetric and basis independent, and Scalar curvature; after those interfaces are fixed, the remaining local or finite argument makes no additional countable-family choice.

On an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold with n3,

Rm=W+1n2(Ric0g)+S2n(n1)(gg),

where W has zero Ricci contraction. This decomposition into a trace-free curvature tensor, a trace-free-Ricci summand, and a scalar summand is unique. In dimension three, W=0. Separately, in dimension two,

Rm=S4(gg).

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

ACω is countable choice and is required here through Kulkarni–Nomizu product, trace-free Ricci tensor, and Weyl curvature, Algebraic symmetries of the Riemann tensor, Ricci curvature is symmetric and basis independent, and Scalar curvature; after those supplied interfaces are fixed, the remaining local or finite calculation makes no additional countable-family choice.

[F1]

The Kulkarni–Nomizu product, Ric0, and W use the displayed sign and coefficient conventions. Kulkarni–Nomizu product, trace-free Ricci tensor, and Weyl curvature.

[F2]

The Riemann tensor has the algebraic curvature symmetries, including pair interchange and Bianchi. Algebraic symmetries of the Riemann tensor.

[F3]

A dual-basis contraction is basis independent. Contraction is independent of the basis formula.

[F4]

The Ricci tensor is the contraction c(Rm)(X,Y)=iRm(ei,X,Y,ei) in an orthonormal basis. Ricci curvature is symmetric and basis independent.

[F5]

Scalar curvature is the metric trace of Ricci. Scalar curvature.

[F6]

Every finite-dimensional real inner-product space has an orthonormal basis. Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis.

Proof

Given: ACω, a tangent inner-product space (TpM,gp) of dimension n and the tensors in the statement.

1.1

Directly exchanging the four inputs in [F1]'s formula shows that hg has both pair skews, pair interchange, and the cyclic Bianchi identity whenever h is symmetric. Hence it is an algebraic curvature tensor. For such a tensor F, define its Ricci contraction by c(F)(X,Y)=iF(ei,X,Y,ei) in an orthonormal basis; [F3] makes this intrinsic.

A1F1F2F3algebra
2.1

Substitution into [F1]'s four-term formula gives c(hg)=(n2)h+(trgh)g: the four sums are respectively (trgh)g, nh, h, and h. In particular, c(gg)=2(n1)g.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

By [F4]–[F5], c(Rm)=Ric and trgRic=S, so trgRic0=0. Applying step 2.1 to [F1]'s formula for W gives c(W)=RicRic0(S/n)g=0. The defining equation for W, rearranged, is the displayed decomposition.

F1F4F5step 2.1algebra
3.2

More generally, suppose Rm=W+h0g+a(gg) with c(W)=0 and trgh0=0. Step 2.1 gives Ric=(n2)h0+2a(n1)g. Taking the metric trace yields S=2an(n1); subtracting (S/n)g then gives Ric0=(n2)h0. Thus a=S/(2n(n1)), h0=Ric0/(n2), and the residual W equals W.

step 2.1F4F5algebra
4.1

Let n=3 and choose an orthonormal basis (e1,e2,e3) using [F6]. Put Aij=W(ei,ej,ej,ei) for i<j. The three diagonal equations c(W)(ei,ei)=0 are A12+A13=0, A12+A23=0, and A13+A23=0, so all Aij vanish. Each off-diagonal equation c(W)(ei,ej)=0 has only the term indexed by the remaining basis vector, because the other two terms vanish by a pair skew; hence all three off-diagonal components of the symmetric bilinear form induced by W on Λ2TpM also vanish. The pair symmetries in [F2] say these six entries determine W, so W=0.

F2F6step 3.1algebra
5.1

Let n=2 and choose an orthonormal basis (e1,e2). If K=Rm(e1,e2,e2,e1), then [F2] and [F4] give Ric(e1,e1)=Ric(e2,e2)=K and Ric(e1,e2)=0; hence [F5] gives S=2K. The tensors Rm and (S/4)(gg) both have the algebraic curvature symmetries, and their single component on the one-dimensional space Λ2TpM is K, because (gg)(e1,e2,e2,e1)=2. Therefore they are equal.

F1F2F4F5F6algebra

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Kulkarni–Nomizu product, trace-free Ricci tensor, and Weyl curvature.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources