How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equal insertion or recording tableaux imply right or left equivalence
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , permutations , their insertion tableaux , recording tableaux , and the Kazhdan–Lusztig cell preorders.
Knuth equivalence satisfies iff , and dual Knuth equivalence satisfies iff (Knuth classes are the fibers of the insertion tableau).
The star table exchanges exactly the four local triples in the two elementary Knuth relations; thus every elementary Knuth move is a right star pair, and each such pair satisfies (Star operations on strings of adjacent simple reflections, Star operations are Knuth moves and preserve the relevant cells).
RSK is symmetric under inversion: and (RSK interchanges the insertion and recording tableaux under inversion).
Inversion transports cell relations: iff (-, - and two-sided Kazhdan–Lusztig preorders and cells).
Statement
For : (a) ; (b) . Equivalently, each Knuth class lies in a single right cell and each dual Knuth class lies in a single left cell.
Proof
Insertion tableaux give right-cell equivalence. Suppose . By [F1], , so there is a finite chain whose successive terms differ by an elementary Knuth move. By [F2], each adjacent pair satisfies ; transitivity of the right-cell equivalence gives . If the chain has length zero, reflexivity gives the same conclusion.
Recording tableaux give left-cell equivalence. Suppose . By [F3], , so step 1.1 applied to gives . Inverting this cell equivalence by [F4] yields .
Class formulation. By [F1], every pair in a Knuth class has equal insertion tableaux, so step 1.1 puts the whole class in one right cell. Every pair in a dual Knuth class has equal recording tableaux, so step 2.1 puts that class in one left cell. These are exactly the two equivalent class statements.
Remarks
The finite Knuth chains use the locally proved star-pair right-cell equivalence; recording-tableau equality is transported through inversion of cells. Coefficientwise positivity is not required.
No choice principle is used.
Depends on
- $L$-, $R$- and two-sided Kazhdan–Lusztig preorders and cells
- Knuth classes are the fibers of the insertion tableau
- Star operations on strings of adjacent simple reflections
- Star operations are Knuth moves and preserve the relevant cells
- RSK interchanges the insertion and recording tableaux under inversion
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.