Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth singular chains and cochains are functorial for smooth maps

Statement

A smooth map f:MN of smooth manifolds, possibly with boundary, induces a real-linear chain map f#:C(M;R)C(N;R) by postcomposition. Precomposition induces cochain and cohomology pullbacks f. These assignments satisfy covariant chain and contravariant cochain/cohomology identity and composition laws.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Smooth maps f:MN and g:NP.

[F1]

Smooth simplices have target-valued neighbourhood extensions; their faces define the smooth subcomplex and its dual (Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes).

[F2]

Identity and composite maps between boundaryless smooth manifolds are smooth (Identity maps and composites of smooth maps are smooth).

[F3]

Boundary smoothness means Euclidean local smooth extension of coordinate representatives (Smooth maps between manifolds with boundary).

Proof

1.1

Composition is smooth also in the boundary case: around a point choose charts for the two maps, take local Euclidean smooth extensions of their coordinate representatives from [F3], and shrink the first extension domain so its image is inside the domain of the second. Their ordinary smooth composite extends the coordinate representative of the composite on the original half-space domain. The same coordinate argument for identity uses the Euclidean identity. This is the chart argument of [F2], with the local extension requirement explicitly respected.

givenF2F3
2.1

If σˉ:OM extends a smooth simplex, fσˉ:ON is smooth by step 1.1 and takes values in N. Thus f#[σ]=[fσ] preserves smooth generators and has a unique finite real-linear extension. For k1, f#[σ]=i(1)i[fσδi]=f#[σ]; for k0 both sides are zero.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Set fφ=φf#. Then δfφ=φf#=φf#=fδφ, so cycles and boundaries are preserved and a quotient pullback is defined. On each smooth generator (gf)#=g#f# and (id)#=id by composition of maps; precomposition reverses these laws, and passing to quotient classes preserves them.

F1step 2.1algebra
4.1

On empty manifolds or negative degrees the maps are the unique zero maps. At degree zero they act by the point maps; on a one-point identity they are the identity of R. Degenerate simplices and constant maps, including those landing in the boundary, retain their target-valued extensions through step 2.1. Each local extension is used for one simplex only; no simultaneous choice and no AC is used.

F1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources