How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Symmetrization and alternation are projections
Statement
For each , the operators and on covariant -tensors satisfy
Their images are exactly the symmetric and alternating covariant tensors.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A covariant -tensor .
Symmetrization and alternation are the normalized averages over , with and without the sign factor (Symmetrization and alternation operators).
Proof
Applying twice gives a double average over . Reindex by the product permutation ; each occurs exactly times, so the second averaging changes nothing. Thus .
The same reindexing works for , and the sign factors multiply to . Hence .
If is symmetric, every summand in [F1] equals , so . Conversely, is fixed by every permutation because averaging over the whole group is permutation-invariant. The alternating case is identical, with the sign picked up under permutation.
Therefore and are projections onto the symmetric and alternating tensors.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)