How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The generating vector field is invariant under its own flow
Statement
Let be the maximal flow of a smooth vector field . Then for each ,
on the common domain of definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The maximal flow of , a time , and a point .
Each time- flow map is a diffeomorphism between open domains (Time-t flow maps are diffeomorphisms between open domains).
The flow satisfies the local group law and its time slices are integral curves of (The fundamental theorem on flows).
Proof
By [L1], is a diffeomorphism near , so is defined there. Consider the curve , where the second equality is the local group law from [L2].
Differentiating at yields But is also the integral curve of through , so by [L2]. Hence .
Since was arbitrary, on the common domain.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)